<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Scheduling the next WG call
- To: Jim Bikoff <jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx>
 
- Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Scheduling the next WG call
 
- From: Mason Cole <mcole@xxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 09:39:37 -0700
 
 
 
I agree as well.
On May 30, 2013, at 8:13 PM, Jim Bikoff wrote:
> 
> I agree with starting at 1730 and limiting the call to an hour and a half.
> 
> Jim
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kiran Malancharuvil <Kiran.Malancharuvil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sender: <owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 00:12:09 
> To: Brian Peck<brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>; 
> gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Scheduling the next WG call
> 
> 
> Can we start the meeting at 1730 and keep it to an hour and a half? I think 
> that if everyone gets their comments in by the deadline that Brian set for 
> input, we can have a productive, and shorter call.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> 
> Kiran
> 
> 
> 
> Kiran Malancharuvil
> Internet Policy Counselor
> MarkMonitor
> +16199727810
> 
> Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse any typos.
> 
> 
> 
> ------ Original Message ------
> 
> From : Brian Peck
> To : gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx;
> Sent : 5/30/2013 8:07 PM
> Subject : [gnso-igo-ingo] Scheduling the next WG call
> 
> As Chuck has mentioned, there is a new gTLD webinar scheduled for 16:00 - 
> 17:30 UTC next Wednesday, 5 June which conflicts with our scheduled WG call 
> (16:00 - 18:00), and the RySG meeting takes place the prior two hours which 
> makes it difficult to move our meeting earlier. Moving the meeting back a 
> couple of hours makes it late for our colleagues in Europe time zones, while 
> moving the meeting to another day would also be difficult to coordinate given 
> different WG meetings and everyone's other commitments.
> 
> Given the situation, we'd like to narrow the options to two choices:
> 
>  1.  Keep the currently scheduled time at 16:00 UTC (if a minimal number of 
> WG members are planning to attend the webinar);
>  2.  Start the meeting one hour later (17:00 – 19:00 UTC) which would result 
> in just a 30 minute conflict with the webinar (from 17:00 – 17:30).
> 
> Please indicate if you have a preference, thanks.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Brian
> 
> Brian Peck
> Policy Director
> ICANN
> 
> 
> 
> 
 
 
 
<<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |