<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Scheduling the next WG call
- To: Jim Bikoff <jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Scheduling the next WG call
- From: Mason Cole <mcole@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 09:39:37 -0700
I agree as well.
On May 30, 2013, at 8:13 PM, Jim Bikoff wrote:
>
> I agree with starting at 1730 and limiting the call to an hour and a half.
>
> Jim
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kiran Malancharuvil <Kiran.Malancharuvil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sender: <owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 00:12:09
> To: Brian Peck<brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>;
> gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Scheduling the next WG call
>
>
> Can we start the meeting at 1730 and keep it to an hour and a half? I think
> that if everyone gets their comments in by the deadline that Brian set for
> input, we can have a productive, and shorter call.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Kiran
>
>
>
> Kiran Malancharuvil
> Internet Policy Counselor
> MarkMonitor
> +16199727810
>
> Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse any typos.
>
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
>
> From : Brian Peck
> To : gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx;
> Sent : 5/30/2013 8:07 PM
> Subject : [gnso-igo-ingo] Scheduling the next WG call
>
> As Chuck has mentioned, there is a new gTLD webinar scheduled for 16:00 -
> 17:30 UTC next Wednesday, 5 June which conflicts with our scheduled WG call
> (16:00 - 18:00), and the RySG meeting takes place the prior two hours which
> makes it difficult to move our meeting earlier. Moving the meeting back a
> couple of hours makes it late for our colleagues in Europe time zones, while
> moving the meeting to another day would also be difficult to coordinate given
> different WG meetings and everyone's other commitments.
>
> Given the situation, we'd like to narrow the options to two choices:
>
> 1. Keep the currently scheduled time at 16:00 UTC (if a minimal number of
> WG members are planning to attend the webinar);
> 2. Start the meeting one hour later (17:00 – 19:00 UTC) which would result
> in just a 30 minute conflict with the webinar (from 17:00 – 17:30).
>
> Please indicate if you have a preference, thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Brian
>
> Brian Peck
> Policy Director
> ICANN
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|