Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Scheduling the next WG call

["David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>]

+1
David W. Maher
Senior Vice President ­ Law & Policy
Public Interest Registry
312 375 4849 




On 5/31/13 11:39 AM, "Mason Cole" <mcole@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>I agree as well.
>
>On May 30, 2013, at 8:13 PM, Jim Bikoff wrote:
>
>> 
>> I agree with starting at 1730 and limiting the call to an hour and a
>>half.
>> 
>> Jim
>> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kiran Malancharuvil <Kiran.Malancharuvil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sender: <owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 00:12:09
>> To: Brian Peck<brian.peck@xxxxxxxxx>;
>>gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Scheduling the next WG call
>> 
>> 
>> Can we start the meeting at 1730 and keep it to an hour and a half? I
>>think that if everyone gets their comments in by the deadline that Brian
>>set for input, we can have a productive, and shorter call.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Kiran
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Kiran Malancharuvil
>> Internet Policy Counselor
>> MarkMonitor
>> +16199727810
>> 
>> Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse any typos.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------ Original Message ------
>> 
>> From : Brian Peck
>> To : gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx;
>> Sent : 5/30/2013 8:07 PM
>> Subject : [gnso-igo-ingo] Scheduling the next WG call
>> 
>> As Chuck has mentioned, there is a new gTLD webinar scheduled for 16:00
>>- 17:30 UTC next Wednesday, 5 June which conflicts with our scheduled WG
>>call (16:00 - 18:00), and the RySG meeting takes place the prior two
>>hours which makes it difficult to move our meeting earlier. Moving the
>>meeting back a couple of hours makes it late for our colleagues in
>>Europe time zones, while moving the meeting to another day would also be
>>difficult to coordinate given different WG meetings and everyone's other
>>commitments.
>> 
>> Given the situation, we'd like to narrow the options to two choices:
>> 
>>  1.  Keep the currently scheduled time at 16:00 UTC (if a minimal
>>number of WG members are planning to attend the webinar);
>>  2.  Start the meeting one hour later (17:00 ­ 19:00 UTC) which would
>>result in just a 30 minute conflict with the webinar (from 17:00 ­
>>17:30).
>> 
>> Please indicate if you have a preference, thanks.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> Brian
>> 
>> Brian Peck
>> Policy Director
>> ICANN
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>