<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO - Final Report
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO - Final Report
- From: Poncelet Ileleji <pileleji@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 08:36:53 +0000
Hello Chuck,
Thanks for the notification and explanations.
Much appreciated
Poncelet
On 5 November 2013 01:21, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I accepted the edits in v.1.4 and created a new redline document with
> some suggested edits and some comments. I also tried to highlight all of
> the comments that required possible further action in yellow so they would
> stand out. Note that my suggested edits end with Section 3.8.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Berry Cobb
> *Sent:* Monday, November 04, 2013 12:39 AM
> *To:* gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO - Final Report
>
>
>
> WG Members,
>
>
>
> Please find attached the latest version of the IGO-INGO Final Report.
> Versions 1.1 to 1.3 reflect changes as a result of moving the
> recommendations section to the top of the report. I accepted those changes
> to reduce the amount of red-line. V1.4 contains the red-line of the
> substantial changes. It will be best for readers to read the report in the
> Final view, but please make sure to also review comments that are appended
> on the side of the report as they contain questions or comments that the WG
> should consider. The following sections should be reviewed closely:
>
> · Recommendations now in sections 3.1 to 3.5
>
> · Section 3.5 now reflects “Consensus Against” for the no
> reservation protections of acronyms recommendations at the top and second
> level
>
> · Section 3.5 also includes a recommendation for the SCI of the
> GNSO Council to review the Consensus Scale per WGG
>
> · Unsupported proposals now reside in section 3.6, which also
> contains tables of proposals for each organization that did not receive
> support
>
> · Implementation considerations on incumbent gTLDs is section 3.7
> and includes reference to an IRT
>
> · Annex 4 contains a completed template for requesting an Issue
> Report for a PDP
>
>
>
> Please review the report in preparation for our review on Wednesday. I
> will accept suggested edits until *23:59, 5 Nov* for this round. This
> will allow me time to collate all changes into the master. When submitting
> any suggestions, please use the red-line track changes feature within v1.4
> of the Word document. If you are unable to submit changes, we will have a
> second round after our Wednesday meeting.
>
>
>
> Note that we do have 1 hour meetings setup 7 & 8 November at 14:00 UTC for
> one hour should we need those times to discuss any issues with the Final
> Report. We have until *23:59, 10 Nov 2013* to submit the report to the
> GNSO Council.
>
>
>
> I will send along an agenda on Tuesday. Thank you. B
>
>
>
> Berry Cobb
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>
> 720.839.5735
>
> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> @berrycobb
>
>
>
>
>
--
Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS
Coordinator
The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio
MDI Road Kanifing South
P. O. Box 421 Banjul
The Gambia, West Africa
Tel: (220) 4370240
Fax:(220) 4390793
Cell:(220) 9912508
Skype: pons_utd
*www.ymca.gm <http://www.ymca.gm>www.waigf.org
<http://www.waigf.org>www.aficta.org <http://www.aficta.org>www.itag.gm
<http://www.itag.gm>www.npoc.org
<http://www.npoc.org>http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753
<http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753>*www.diplointernetgovernance.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|