[gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Final GNSO Motion Redline

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jim's edits appear to be mostly good wording changes.  Understanding that I did 
not have time to go back and confirm factual details, to the extent that the 
edits are factually correct, I am fine with them.

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 6:46 PM
To: Jim Bikoff
Cc: Berry Cobb Mail; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Re: Final GNSO Motion Redline

Hi Jim,

Thanks so much for getting your suggested edits in to the group today. We will 
have your proposed revisions available for the WG to discuss during the next 
call (or on Friday).

While awaiting WG feedback on the motion, including these new suggested edits, 
I just wanted to note a couple of observations about two of the proposed 
changes to the Whereas clauses:

  *   For Whereas clause 12, the Final Issue Report does not expressly 
recommend that the GNSO consider "whether to extend the temporary protections 
already afforded to the RCRC and the IOC", although the Report acknowledges the 
temporary protections in place and so this may have been implicit in the 
broader recommendation for the GNSO to evaluate the need and extent of 
protections (and not just on a temporary basis) for IGOs and INGOs, including 
the RCRC and the IOC.
  *   For Whereas clause 14, the language of the Board/NGPC Resolution does 
not, in the relevant Resolved clause, specifically mention INGOs, although the 
Board/NGPC does acknowledge in an earlier Resolved clause the ongoing GNSO work 
on both IGOs and INGOs, and although it is possible that the Board meant to 
include INGOs as long as they satisfy the stated criteria in the Resolution.
These could just be matters of semantics or perception, but for what it's worth 
I thought I'd explain the staff thinking behind wording those specific Whereas 
clauses in the way we did.

We look forward to discussing the set of revisions and more significantly the 
Resolved clauses with you and the rest of the WG later this week.

Thanks and cheers,
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>

* One World. One Internet. *

From: Jim Bikoff <jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 5:43 PM
To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: Berry Cobb Mail <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, 
"gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Final GNSO Motion Redline

Mary,

As discussed during our teleconference earlier today, attached are our proposed 
revisions to the latest circulated draft motion.

Thanks for your hard work in preparing the motion.

Best regards,

Jim

James L. Bikoff
Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, LLP
1101 30th Street, NW
Suite 120
Washington, DC 20007
Tel: 202-944-3303
Fax: 202-944-3306
jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx>