<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Last Call: Raising an Issue
- To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Last Call: Raising an Issue
- From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:52:03 -0700
Dear SCI members,
On today's call it was agreed that there should be a "last call" for the review
of the options on raising an issue. Based on the discussion in Toronto and in
today's meeting it appears that there is consensus around option number 1 —
maintaining the status quo. See the details below and on the wiki at:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg00390.html.
Please respond by **Friday, 09 November COB** as to whether you favor option 1
or another option.
Thank you for your assistance.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For your review - raising an issue options
* To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
* Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] For your review - raising an issue options
* From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
* Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 03:32:13 -0700
________________________________
Dear All, In relation to the agenda item 'Raising an issue - Has this been
sufficiently clarified', three possible approaches were identified during the
last meeting: 1. Maintain status quo - which means only the GNSO Council or
a group chartered by the GNSO Council can request an item to be reviewed by
the SCI. Possibly consider communicating to other SO/ACs / individuals, that
if there are issues they would like to see reviewed by the SCI, that they will
need to channel these via the GNSO Council and/or a group chartered by the
GNSO Council. 2. Add the possibility for other ICANN SO/ACs to make a direct
request to the SCI – this would require a change to the SCI Charter and would
need GNSO Council approval. 3. Add the possibility for any chartered group
to make a direct request to the SCI – this would require a change to the SCI
Charter and would need GNSO Council approval. Some also noted that a
definition of 'chartered' would be needed as it is not clear whether SO/ACs
are chartered. Members are encouraged to share their views on these three
options and/or identify any other options that should be considered to address
thisissue ahead of the next meeting. With best regards, Marika
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|