Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting

["J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All:


I will be in other meetings all day tomorrow and will not be able to make this 
call.  However, I want to voice my support for sending the deferral of motions 
statement, as revised in Toronto to the Council and I also support option 1 
(maintain status quo) on raising an issue.

J. Scott
 
j. scott evans -  head of global brand, domains & copyright - Yahoo! Inc. - 
408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx




________________________________
 From: "KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:57 AM
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting
 

 
All,
 
For the meeting tomorrow see the following draft agenda which is the same as 
last time.
Since we had only limited participation items 4 and 5 have not been discussed.
Option #1 for item 7 (status quo) has not been opposed since the last request 
for comments.
 
 
1. Roll call 
2. Statement of Interests 
3. Approval of the agenda
4. Chair and Vice Chair election
5. Deferral of Motions — updated response circulated by J. Scott 
6. Update on Public Comments on Changes to the PDP Manual for Suspension of a 
PDP (Julie Hedlund) 
7. Raising an issue — Seems to be support for option nr 1 — maintain status quo 
8. Status update on Working Group survey 
9. AOB
 
Re chair and VC election I suggest the following process in accordance with 
what we've done last time:
1. Nomination of candidates from the membership
2. In case of more than 1 nominee for each position election should be held by 
balloting.
 
 
 
Looking forward to hearing you tomorrow
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich