RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting

["Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxx>]

I am planning to be on the call.
Anne

[cid:576591420@14112012-2F72]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx> • 
www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original 
message.


________________________________
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of J. Scott Evans
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 11:49 AM
To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting

Dear All:

I will be in other meetings all day tomorrow and will not be able to make this 
call.  However, I want to voice my support for sending the deferral of motions 
statement, as revised in Toronto to the Council and I also support option 1 
(maintain status quo) on raising an issue.

J. Scott

j. scott evans -  head of global brand, domains & copyright - Yahoo! Inc. - 
408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx


________________________________
From: "KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:57 AM
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting

All,

For the meeting tomorrow see the following draft agenda which is the same as 
last time.
Since we had only limited participation items 4 and 5 have not been discussed.
Option #1 for item 7 (status quo) has not been opposed since the last request 
for comments.


1. Roll call
2. Statement of Interests
3. Approval of the agenda
4. Chair and Vice Chair election
5. Deferral of Motions — updated response circulated by J. Scott
6. Update on Public Comments on Changes to the PDP Manual for Suspension of a 
PDP (Julie Hedlund)
7. Raising an issue — Seems to be support for option nr 1 — maintain status quo
8. Status update on Working Group survey
9. AOB

Re chair and VC election I suggest the following process in accordance with 
what we've done last time:
1. Nomination of candidates from the membership
2. In case of more than 1 nominee for each position election should be held by 
balloting.



Looking forward to hearing you tomorrow
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich







________________________________

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to 
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.

Phoenix (602)262-5311           Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090            Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200         Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying 
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that 
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or 
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of 
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.