Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I cannot make the meeting because I am going to be attending a session that 
will educate me, I hope, on the Copywrite Alert system at the time

I support the current language for deferral and thank J. Scott for the edit.

I support status quo for raising an issue.

avri

On 14 Nov 2012, at 16:16, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Avri,
> 
> since you can't be available at the meeting: what's your view on the 2 items? 
> Depending on participation tomorrow we may decide to send it to the council 
> as envisaged.
> 
> Best regards 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
> 
> Von: J. Scott Evans [mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. November 2012 19:49
> An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting
> 
> Dear All:
> 
> I will be in other meetings all day tomorrow and will not be able to make 
> this call.  However, I want to voice my support for sending the deferral of 
> motions statement, as revised in Toronto to the Council and I also support 
> option 1 (maintain status quo) on raising an issue.
> 
> J. Scott
> 
> j. scott evans -  head of global brand, domains & copyright - Yahoo! Inc. - 
> 408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> From: "KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:57 AM
> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting
> 
> All,
> 
> For the meeting tomorrow see the following draft agenda which is the same as 
> last time.
> Since we had only limited participation items 4 and 5 have not been discussed.
> Option #1 for item 7 (status quo) has not been opposed since the last request 
> for comments.
> 
> 
> 1. Roll call
> 2. Statement of Interests
> 3. Approval of the agenda
> 4. Chair and Vice Chair election
> 5. Deferral of Motions — updated response circulated by J. Scott
> 6. Update on Public Comments on Changes to the PDP Manual for Suspension of a 
> PDP (Julie Hedlund)
> 7. Raising an issue — Seems to be support for option nr 1 — maintain status 
> quo
> 8. Status update on Working Group survey
> 9. AOB
> 
> Re chair and VC election I suggest the following process in accordance with 
> what we've done last time:
> 1. Nomination of candidates from the membership
> 2. In case of more than 1 nominee for each position election should be held 
> by balloting.
> 
> 
> 
> Looking forward to hearing you tomorrow
> Best regards
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
> 
> 
>