ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting

  • To: "KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting
  • From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:45:48 -0800

Dear Wolf-Ulrich,

I will have to miss tomorrow's call.  Merika will support the call in my place.

However, here is my update on agenda item 6. Public Comments on Changes to the 
PDP Manual for Suspension of a PDP.  This comment has been posted in the Forum: 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-pdp-manual/msg00000.html.

Because we have received a comment the reply comment period commences.  It 
began yesterday 13 November, and will close on 03 December.  After the reply 
comment period closes I will provide a summary and analysis of the comments and 
reply comments.

Best regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

From: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 11:57 AM
To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI meeting

All,

For the meeting tomorrow see the following draft agenda which is the same as 
last time.
Since we had only limited participation items 4 and 5 have not been discussed.
Option #1 for item 7 (status quo) has not been opposed since the last request 
for comments.


1. Roll call
2. Statement of Interests
3. Approval of the agenda
4. Chair and Vice Chair election
5. Deferral of Motions — updated response circulated by J. Scott
6. Update on Public Comments on Changes to the PDP Manual for Suspension of a 
PDP (Julie Hedlund)
7. Raising an issue — Seems to be support for option nr 1 — maintain status quo
8. Status update on Working Group survey
9. AOB

Re chair and VC election I suggest the following process in accordance with 
what we've done last time:
1. Nomination of candidates from the membership
2. In case of more than 1 nominee for each position election should be held by 
balloting.



Looking forward to hearing you tomorrow
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy