ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

  • To: Lori Schulman <lschulman@xxxxxxxx>, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
  • From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:32:14 +0000

Dear Amr, Lori, and Ken,

We are trying to choose a date for the next call.  As you've noted, we did
not get out a timely notice for a call Thursday, 09 July at 1800 UTC so
there will be no call on Thursday.  We also note that 16 July presents a
problem for SCI members of the CCWG who will be traveling.  Although Anne
cannot chair a call on 23 July if Rudi Vansnick as our Vice Chair can run
the call then perhaps we can shoot for that date.

Best regards,
Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

On 7/7/15 8:54 AM, "Lori Schulman" <lschulman@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>I am available tomorrow after 2 pm EDT.  I am also available on the other
>suggested days.
>
>With kind regards,
>
>Lori S. Schulman
>Senior Director, Internet Policy
>International Trademark Association (INTA)
>+1-202-261-6588
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr
>Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 8:19 AM
>To: Julie Hedlund
>Cc: WUKnoben; Angie Graves; Aikman-Scalese, Anne;
>gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx; Mary Wong; Nathalie Peregrine
>Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Do we have a call scheduled for tomorrow? I have another commitment on
>hold until this one is confirmed. Would be helpful to know as soon as
>possible.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Amr
>
>On Jul 6, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Dear Anne and SCI members,
>> 
>> Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to
>>get the notice out today.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Julie
>> 
>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>> 
>> From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
>> To: Angie Graves <angie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne"
>><AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>,
>>"gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>,
>>Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>, Nathalie Peregrine
>><nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>> 
>>> Thanks Anne,
>>>  
>>> for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since
>>>I'm travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.
>>> 
>>> Best regards
>>> 
>>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>> 
>>>  
>>> From: Angie Graves
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
>>> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>>> Cc: Julie Hedlund ; mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx ; Mary Wong
>>>; Nathalie Peregrine
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>>>  
>>> Thank you, Anne, for the update.
>>>  
>>> I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially
>>>problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.
>>>  
>>> Angie
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>>><AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Dear SCI Members,
>>>> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our
>>>>discussion of
>>>> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
>>>> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to
>>>>motions.
>>>>  
>>>> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in
>>>>the GNSO Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion
>>>>regarding the Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
>>>>  
>>>> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to
>>>>resubmitted motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri
>>>>respectively to lay out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and
>>>>"Con"(Avri). 
>>>> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA
>>>>which I encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
>>>>  
>>>> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose
>>>>problems for those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to
>>>>Paris.  Personally I am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to
>>>>chair.  Please advise your preference.
>>>>  
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Anne
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>>>> Of Counsel
>>>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>>>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
>>>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>>> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
>>>> AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx | www.LRRLaw.com
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>>>>individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of
>>>>this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the
>>>>employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment
>>>>to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
>>>>dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any
>>>>attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>>>>communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to
>>>>the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
>>>>attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>>>>confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
>>>>Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. ยง2510-2521.
>>>  
>
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy