Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER: Consensus Call: Current Practice in Relation to Motions
Hi Julie, I saw your message and yes let’s put it on the agenda of today’s call. Perhaps the agenda could be : - roll call - request for extension of full consensus call for GNSO Operating Procedures Proposed Revision Relating to Motions & Amendments - discussion subteam B : chair/vice-chair elections - aob Sorry for being late with the agenda, too many meetings going on (at this moment in GSE call) Rudi Vansnick > Op 21 apr. 2016, om 14:57 heeft Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> het > volgende geschreven: > > Dear Rudi, > > I replied to Amr just now without first seeing your message. There is no > rule of which I am aware that would prevent an extension, but the customary > time period is two weeks. I had separately suggested that perhaps we could > discuss Amr’s request on our call today and if there are no objections then > we could grant the extension. > > Kind regards, > Julie > > From: Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx> > Date: Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 6:46 AM > To: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, > "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER: Consensus Call: Current > Practice in Relation to Motions > > Dear Amr, > > I prefer asking Julie if it is appropriate to extend the deadline for the > consensus till the 25th. Personally I see no objection, it just covers the > weekend extra. > > Julie, can we extend this call ? > > Regards, > > Rudi Vansnick > > > > >> Op 21 apr. 2016, om 12:11 heeft Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> het >> volgende geschreven: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I know that this request is a pain, but I was hoping we could have the >> deadline for this extended…, perhaps until Monday, April 25th. >> >> If folks don’t agree to this, no hard feelings. I won’t hold it against >> anyone. :) >> >> Thanks. >> >> Amr >> >>> On Apr 20, 2016, at 4:27 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Dear SCI members, >>> >>> This is a reminder — deadline is 21 April. >>> >>> As agreed on the SCI call on 07 April, the attached document, CONSENSUS >>> CALL-GNSO Operating Procedures Proposed Revision Relating to Motions & >>> Amendments 07 April 2016, is being circulated for a formal Consensus Call. >>> The document is the proposed revision to the GNSO Operating Procedures to >>> include the new text on submitting, seconding, and amending motions. >>> >>> Background: >>> • On 05 March 2015 the SCI submitted to the GNSO Council a Review Request >>> (see attached) concerning the fact that there are currently no formal >>> procedures on (i) whether, how and by whom a properly submitted motion is >>> to be seconded, and (ii) treatment of proposed amendments to such motions >>> as either “friendly” or “unfriendly”. The Review Request was one of two >>> that the Council approved at its meeting on 16 April 2015. In the attached >>> Review Request the GNSO Council asked that the SCI codify the existing >>> customary practices of the GNSO Council and consider new processes to >>> govern the seconding of motions and amendments to motions. >>> • On 09 October 2015 the SCI agreed on a documentation of the Current >>> Practice Relating to Motions and sent a letter (attached) along with the >>> original Review Request and the documentation to Jonathan Robinson, GNSO >>> Council Chair. >>> • In December 2015 the SCI established a Sub Team A — Sara Bockey, Angie >>> Graves, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben, and Lawrence Olawale-Roberts, and Rudi Vansnick >>> — to review the current practice and the Sub Team submitted its >>> recommendations to the SCI on 02 March 2016. The SCI discussed the >>> recommendations in Marrakech on 05 March and asked staff to draft revisions >>> to the GNSO Operating Procedures per the recommendations. >>> • On 07 April the SCI discussed the draft revisions and asked staff to >>> submit them to the SCI for a Consensus Call. >>> If there are no objections or changes received in two weeks by Thursday 21 >>> April, the language will be presumed to be accepted by Full Consensus. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Julie >>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> <CONSENSUS CALL-GNSO Operating Procedures Proposed Revision Relating to >>> Motions & Amendments 07 April 2016.docx><CONSENSUS CALL-GNSO Operating >>> Procedures Proposed Revision Relating to Motions & Amendments 07 April >>> 2016.pdf><SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Concerning Current Practice in >>> Relation to Motions 09 Oct 2015.pdf><SCI Review Request - Motions - 5 Mar >>> 2015 v2.pdf> >> >> > Attachment:
signature.asc
|