Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER: Consensus Call: Current Practice in Relation to Motions
Hi Rudi, Many thanks for this agenda. I’ll get it posted in the Adobe Connect room. Kind regards, Julie On 4/21/16, 9:13 AM, "Rudi Vansnick" <rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx> wrote: >Hi Julie, > >I saw your message and yes let’s put it on the agenda of today’s call. Perhaps >the agenda could be : >- roll call >- request for extension of full consensus call for GNSO Operating Procedures >Proposed Revision Relating to Motions & Amendments >- discussion subteam B : chair/vice-chair elections >- aob > > >Sorry for being late with the agenda, too many meetings going on (at this >moment in GSE call) > >Rudi Vansnick > > > > >> Op 21 apr. 2016, om 14:57 heeft Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> het >> volgende geschreven: >> >> Dear Rudi, >> >> I replied to Amr just now without first seeing your message. There is no >> rule of which I am aware that would prevent an extension, but the customary >> time period is two weeks. I had separately suggested that perhaps we could >> discuss Amr’s request on our call today and if there are no objections then >> we could grant the extension. >> >> Kind regards, >> Julie >> >> From: Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx> >> Date: Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 6:46 AM >> To: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, >> "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER: Consensus Call: Current >> Practice in Relation to Motions >> >> Dear Amr, >> >> I prefer asking Julie if it is appropriate to extend the deadline for the >> consensus till the 25th. Personally I see no objection, it just covers the >> weekend extra. >> >> Julie, can we extend this call ? >> >> Regards, >> >> Rudi Vansnick >> >> >> >> >>> Op 21 apr. 2016, om 12:11 heeft Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> het >>> volgende geschreven: >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I know that this request is a pain, but I was hoping we could have the >>> deadline for this extended…, perhaps until Monday, April 25th. >>> >>> If folks don’t agree to this, no hard feelings. I won’t hold it against >>> anyone. :) >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Amr >>> >>>> On Apr 20, 2016, at 4:27 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear SCI members, >>>> >>>> This is a reminder — deadline is 21 April. >>>> >>>> As agreed on the SCI call on 07 April, the attached document, CONSENSUS >>>> CALL-GNSO Operating Procedures Proposed Revision Relating to Motions & >>>> Amendments 07 April 2016, is being circulated for a formal Consensus Call. >>>> The document is the proposed revision to the GNSO Operating Procedures to >>>> include the new text on submitting, seconding, and amending motions. >>>> >>>> Background: >>>> • On 05 March 2015 the SCI submitted to the GNSO Council a Review Request >>>> (see attached) concerning the fact that there are currently no formal >>>> procedures on (i) whether, how and by whom a properly submitted motion is >>>> to be seconded, and (ii) treatment of proposed amendments to such motions >>>> as either “friendly” or “unfriendly”. The Review Request was one of two >>>> that the Council approved at its meeting on 16 April 2015. In the attached >>>> Review Request the GNSO Council asked that the SCI codify the existing >>>> customary practices of the GNSO Council and consider new processes to >>>> govern the seconding of motions and amendments to motions. >>>> • On 09 October 2015 the SCI agreed on a documentation of the Current >>>> Practice Relating to Motions and sent a letter (attached) along with the >>>> original Review Request and the documentation to Jonathan Robinson, GNSO >>>> Council Chair. >>>> • In December 2015 the SCI established a Sub Team A — Sara Bockey, Angie >>>> Graves, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben, and Lawrence Olawale-Roberts, and Rudi >>>> Vansnick — to review the current practice and the Sub Team submitted its >>>> recommendations to the SCI on 02 March 2016. The SCI discussed the >>>> recommendations in Marrakech on 05 March and asked staff to draft >>>> revisions to the GNSO Operating Procedures per the recommendations. >>>> • On 07 April the SCI discussed the draft revisions and asked staff to >>>> submit them to the SCI for a Consensus Call. >>>> If there are no objections or changes received in two weeks by Thursday 21 >>>> April, the language will be presumed to be accepted by Full Consensus. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Julie >>>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> <CONSENSUS CALL-GNSO Operating Procedures Proposed Revision Relating to >>>> Motions & Amendments 07 April 2016.docx><CONSENSUS CALL-GNSO Operating >>>> Procedures Proposed Revision Relating to Motions & Amendments 07 April >>>> 2016.pdf><SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Concerning Current Practice in >>>> Relation to Motions 09 Oct 2015.pdf><SCI Review Request - Motions - 5 Mar >>>> 2015 v2.pdf> >>> >>> >> > Attachment:
smime.p7s
|