ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-iocrc-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Summing up Option 7

  • To: "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <wolfgang.kleinwaechter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Joy Liddicoat" <joy@xxxxxxx>, "gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Summing up Option 7
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:33:14 +0000

I think we are all in agreement to consult with the GAC so we can let them tell 
us once we have a proposed recommendation to give them.  In the meantime, any 
clarification of this would be helpful as Jeff has requested.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang"
> [mailto:wolfgang.kleinwaechter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 4:56 AM
> To: Konstantinos Komaitis; Neuman, Jeff; Joy Liddicoat; Gomes, Chuck;
> gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: AW: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Summing up Option 7
> 
> Jeff:
> 
> I don't know enough about this to know whether GAC members would
> welcome the reference to WIPOs work especially where it seemingly could
> go against aspects of their latest proposal.   Leaving the amorphous
> concept in our proposal, especially when not baked into law in most
> global jurisdictions, seems to me to be a controversial concept.  If I
> am wrong, please let me know.
> 
> 
> 
> Wolfgang:
> 
> WIPO is an observer in the GAC. Best thing is to involved them directly
> into the discussion.
> 
> 
> 
> 





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy