RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Language Issue Solution

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Me too.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Rickert [mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 5:01 PM
> To: Neuman, Jeff
> Cc: Gomes, Chuck; Konstantinos Komaitis; Jim Bikoff; Gregory Shatan;
> gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx; David Heasley; Kiran Malancharuvil
> Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Language Issue Solution
> 
> Happy with this wording!
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> Am 13.03.2012 um 14:58 schrieb Neuman, Jeff:
> 
> >
> > My gut is that we should take all subjectivity out of it and
> basically just state:
> >
> > The GAC has proposed that the IOC and RCRC "names should be protected
> in multiple languages-all translations of the listed names in languages
> used on the Internet...The lists of protected names that the IOC and
> RC/RC have provided are illustrative and representative, not
> exhaustive. The Drafting Team recommends that for this initial round,
> the list of languages currently provided in Section 2.2.1.2.3 of the
> Applicant Guidebook are sufficient.
> >
> > This is more objective and should not lead to any debate
> >
> > Jeffrey J. Neuman
> > Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
> >
> >
> > The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
> the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
> and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient
> you have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify us immediately and delete the original message.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:47 PM
> > To: Konstantinos Komaitis; Jim Bikoff; Neuman, Jeff; Gregory Shatan;
> gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: David Heasley; Kiran Malancharuvil
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Language Issue Solution
> >
> > My first reaction is that Konstantinos suggestion is reasonable.  Do
> any of you disagree?
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-
> >> dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Konstantinos Komaitis
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 3:40 PM
> >> To: Jim Bikoff; Jeff Neuman; Gregory Shatan; gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Cc: David Heasley; Kiran Malancharuvil
> >> Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Language Issue Solution
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank you very much for the clarification Jim. We should, however,
> >> identify a way where any addition of new languages beyond this
> >> illustrative list should be done in a way that is not arbitrary. I
> am
> >> not certain how this can be achieved, but my point is to prevent the
> >> addition of languages without having a mechanism where a)the need to
> >> add the additional language is verified and, b) the addition is part
> >> of a clear and unambiguous  justification of why the terms should be
> >> protected because, especially under national laws.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Konstantinos
> >>
> >> From: Jim Bikoff <jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx>>
> >> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:22:20 +0000
> >> To: Jeff Neuman
> >> <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>>, Gregory
> >> Shatan <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>,
> >> "gnso-iocrc- dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>"
> >> <gnso-iocrc- dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
> >> Cc: David Heasley <dheasley@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:dheasley@xxxxxxxxx>>,
> >> Kiran Malancharuvil
> >> <kmalancharuvil@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:kmalancharuvil@xxxxxxxxx>>
> >> Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Language Issue Solution
> >>
> >> All,
> >>
> >> Proposal 2 would now read as follows:
> >>
> >> The GAC has proposed that the IOC and RCRC "names should be
> protected
> >> in multiple languages-all translations of the listed names in
> >> languages used on the Internet...The lists of protected names that the
> >> IOC and RC/RC have provided are illustrative and representative, not
> >> exhaustive."
> >>
> >> The Drafting Team agrees that the list of languages currently
> provided
> >> in Section 2.2.1.2.3 of the Applicant Guidebook are illustrative and
> >> representative.
> >> Other illustrative and representative languages can be added to the
> >> list later, to cover the second level and later application rounds.
> >>
> >> Jim Bikoff
> >>
> >>
> >> James L. Bikoff
> >> Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, LLP
> >> 1101 30th Street, NW
> >> Suite 120
> >> Washington, DC 20007
> >> Tel: 202-944-3303
> >> Fax: 202-944-3306
> >> jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-
> >> dt@xxxxxxxxx> [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-
> >> dt@xxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx]> On
> Behalf
> >> Of Shatan, Gregory S.
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:10 PM
> >> To: Hughes, Debra Y.; Neuman, Jeff; Kiran Malancharuvil; gnso-iocrc-
> >> dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Jim Bikoff; shankins@xxxxxxxx<mailto:shankins@xxxxxxxx>;
> >> christophe.lanord@xxxxxxxx<mailto:christophe.lanord@xxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Languge Issue Solution Is the
> >> appropriate change:
> >>
> >> 1.  To remove the last sentence of Proposal 2 2.  To remove all of
> >> Proposal 2 (referring to as many languages as feasible), or 3.  To
> >> edit Proposal 2 to support the utilization only of the languages set
> >> forth in the AGB?
> >>
> >> Leaving the rest of Proposal 2 doesn't seem to make sense to me,
> since
> >> it is at odds with the proposed change below.  Thus, I would suggest
> >> the amendment should be either 2 or 3 above.
> >>
> >> Greg
> >>
> >>
> >> Gregory S. Shatan
> >> Deputy Chair| Tech Transactions Group
> >> IP | Technology | Media
> >> ReedSmithLLP
> >> The business of relationships
> >> 599 Lexington Avenue
> >> New York, NY 10022
> >> 212.549.0275| Phone
> >> 917.816.6428| Mobile
> >> 212.521.5450| Fax
> >> gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> www.reedsmith.com<http://www.reedsmith.com>
> >>
> >> pdc1
> >
> >