<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Apologies for Wednesday Meeting
- To: "'rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx'" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Apologies for Wednesday Meeting
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:29:31 +0000
I will do it.
Chuck
From: Thomas Rickert [mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 03:21 AM
To: Neuman, Jeff <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Apologies for Wednesday Meeting
Jeff,
thanks for your message and I am sorry, but I cannot make today's call either
so I cannot chair it.
Kind regards,
Thomas
Am 19.09.2012 um 05:20 schrieb Neuman, Jeff:
All,
A meeting I am unable to get out of has just come up that makes it impossible
for me to attend the call. It would still be good for you all to discuss the
e-mail sent around earlier to make sure that I have worded the proposal
accurately and to refine if necessary, so that we can get final feedback on the
consensus call by September 26th.
I am going to ask Chuck or Thomas if they can lead the call….sorry to put you
two on the spot. If you want, you can discuss the Board resolution as well. I
believe that our current proposal may be in line with the resolution, but there
may be some issues I believe that need to be addressed.
The resolution states:
Resolved (NG2012.09.13.01), if it is not possible to conclude the policy work
prior to 31 January 2013, the Board requests that the GNSO Council advise the
Board by no later than that date if it is aware of any reason, such as concerns
with the global public interest or the security or stability of the DNS, that
the Board should take into account in making its decision about whether to
include second level protections for the IOC and Red Cross/Red Crescent names
listed in section 2.2.1.2.3 of the Applicant Guidebook by inclusion on a
Reserved Names List applicable in all new gTLD registries approved in the first
round of the New gTLD Program
What does it mean to “conclude the policy work”? If the GNSO recommends the
“moratorium on registrations”, but initiates the pdp (which will not likely be
done by 1/31/13), would the Board attempt to override the ongoing pdp. Or
would the moratorium on registrations satisfy this requirement. I would like
to see if the Board’s new gTLD Program Committee could give us some more
details about this. Please let me know if you share my concerns.
Thanks in advance and I apologize for not being able to attend, but I wil
listen to the recording.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
46000 Center Oak Plaza, Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx> /
www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz/>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|