<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Apologies for Wednesday Meeting
- To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Apologies for Wednesday Meeting
- From: Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:21:39 +0200
Jeff,
thanks for your message and I am sorry, but I cannot make today's call either
so I cannot chair it.
Kind regards,
Thomas
Am 19.09.2012 um 05:20 schrieb Neuman, Jeff:
> All,
>
> A meeting I am unable to get out of has just come up that makes it impossible
> for me to attend the call. It would still be good for you all to discuss the
> e-mail sent around earlier to make sure that I have worded the proposal
> accurately and to refine if necessary, so that we can get final feedback on
> the consensus call by September 26th.
>
> I am going to ask Chuck or Thomas if they can lead the call….sorry to put you
> two on the spot. If you want, you can discuss the Board resolution as well.
> I believe that our current proposal may be in line with the resolution, but
> there may be some issues I believe that need to be addressed.
>
> The resolution states:
>
> Resolved (NG2012.09.13.01), if it is not possible to conclude the policy work
> prior to 31 January 2013, the Board requests that the GNSO Council advise the
> Board by no later than that date if it is aware of any reason, such as
> concerns with the global public interest or the security or stability of the
> DNS, that the Board should take into account in making its decision about
> whether to include second level protections for the IOC and Red Cross/Red
> Crescent names listed in section 2.2.1.2.3 of the Applicant Guidebook by
> inclusion on a Reserved Names List applicable in all new gTLD registries
> approved in the first round of the New gTLD Program
>
> What does it mean to “conclude the policy work”? If the GNSO recommends the
> “moratorium on registrations”, but initiates the pdp (which will not likely
> be done by 1/31/13), would the Board attempt to override the ongoing pdp. Or
> would the moratorium on registrations satisfy this requirement. I would like
> to see if the Board’s new gTLD Program Committee could give us some more
> details about this. Please let me know if you share my concerns.
>
> Thanks in advance and I apologize for not being able to attend, but I wil
> listen to the recording.
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
> 46000 Center Oak Plaza, Sterling, VA 20166
> Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
> jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx / www.neustar.biz
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|