Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Submission from an ALAC member

["J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All:

I will not be able to make today's scheduled call because I am giving a speech 
at that time.  Greg is not able to make it due to the holiday.  Accordingly, I 
want to put forth the input of the IPC on the call for consensus.

The IPC does not believe that a PDP is necessary.  We feel that the purpose of 
the DT was to refine implementation details to enact the GAC advice concerning 
additional protections for the IOC/RC names on the first and second levels.  In 
fact, we did make specific recommendations with regard to additional 
protections on the top level.

Unfortunately, there is no consensus in the DT to provide the same type of 
recommendations on the second level.  In contrast, the rough consensus is that 
the DT should recommend a PDP.  While we disagree with this position, we 
believe it is an acceptable compromise to accede to the recommendation for a 
PDP so long as there is a temporary reservations of the IOC/RC names on the 
second level pending the outcome of the recommended PDP. 

I would appreciate if this statement were made a part of the record for today's 
call.

I am sorry to have to miss today's call.

J. Scott
 
j. scott evans -  head of global brand, domains & copyright - Yahoo! Inc. - 
408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx




________________________________
 From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
To: GNSO IOC RC DT <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 7:04 AM
Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Submission from an ALAC member
 
I have been asked to pass this document on to the IOC/RC Drafting Team on 
behalf of Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro (aka Sala), an ALAC member from Fiji.

It represents her views and has not been endorsed by the ALAC, and I submit it 
without further comment.

Alan