<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] The list of "temporarily reserved strings"
- To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] The list of "temporarily reserved strings"
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 16:06:11 +0000
Thanks Alan. I think it would be helpful to find out from ICANN staff why the
AG varies from the GAC request.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-
> dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 11:30 PM
> To: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] The list of "temporarily reserved strings"
>
>
> During the meetingtoday, the issue came up whether we should be using
> the list published in the AG, or in the September 2011 GAC letter to
> the GNSO.
>
> I did a quick review of them.
>
> Red Cross: The GAC list includes Danish/Norwegian and Japanese that are
> not in the AG.
>
> IOC: The lists are almost identical, except to my untrained eye (as
> well as Google Translate), the Arabic version in the two documents seem
> quite different.
>
> Alan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|