ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-irtp-b-jun09]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Your feedback requested - Issue E

  • To: "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, <Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Your feedback requested - Issue E
  • From: "Matt Mansell" <matt.mansell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 07:01:10 +0100

Hi Marika

 

I can see were Michelle was coming from on this. There are a couple of
occasions in the UK when we basically have 4 days of holidays (Fri
through Mon) and I guess the same case (even longer) could be had for
all over a xmas period falling on the wrong days.

 

To this extent I can see why "Business Days" is preferred but appreciate
its hard to define worldwide. That said, we are talking about a remedy
in the case that the registrar doesn't provide an ability for the
registrant to do this themselves via their control panel. That's pretty
basic in my opinion, so if a registrar doesn't allow the end user to
control, then they should need to work the weekend to comply!

 

Therefore, I support 5 calendar days.

 

M

 

From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 05 May 2010 09:16
To: Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Your feedback requested - Issue E

 

Issue E: Whether, and if so, how best to clarify denial reason #7: A
domain name was already in "lock status" provided that the Registrar
provides a readily accessible and reasonable means for the Registered
Name Holder to remove the lock status.

Proposed modification of denial reason #7: 
Prior to receipt of the transfer request, the domain name was locked
pursuant to the Registrar's published security policy or at the
direction of the Registered Name Holder provided that the Registrar
includes in its registration agreement the terms and conditions upon
which it locks domains and further that the Registrar provides a readily
accessible and reasonable means for the Registered Name Holder to remove
the lock status. If the Registrar does not provide a means to allow a
Registered Name Holder to remove the lock status themselves, then
Registrar must facilitate removing the lock within 5 calendar days / 5
working days / 10 business days of receiving a request from the
Registered Name Holder.

Questions for the members of the WG:

1/ Do you support the proposed modification to change denial reason #7?

*       If yes, please indicate which timeframe you would support: 5
calendar days, 5 working days or 10 business days 
*       If no, please provide your feedback as to why you do not support
the proposed modification and, if possible, provide an alternative
recommendation for consideration



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email (including attachments) is confidential and intended only for the 
use of the addressee(s). If you are not an addressee you should not copy it, 
re-transmit it, use it or disclose its contents, but should advise the sender 
immediately and delete your copy from your system(s). Do not copy, use or 
disclose this email. Mesh Digital Ltd do not accept legal responsibility for 
the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those 
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Mesh Digital Ltd. 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy