RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Your feedback requested - Issue E

["Steele, Barbara" <BSteele@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The RySG supports the modification and the timeframe of 5 calendar days.

 

Barbara Steele 
Compliance Officer / Director of Policy 



 

From: owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 4:16 AM
To: Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Your feedback requested - Issue E

 

Issue E: Whether, and if so, how best to clarify denial reason #7: A domain
name was already in "lock status" provided that the Registrar provides a
readily accessible and reasonable means for the Registered Name Holder to
remove the lock status.

Proposed modification of denial reason #7: 
Prior to receipt of the transfer request, the domain name was locked
pursuant to the Registrar's published security policy or at the direction of
the Registered Name Holder provided that the Registrar includes in its
registration agreement the terms and conditions upon which it locks domains
and further that the Registrar provides a readily accessible and reasonable
means for the Registered Name Holder to remove the lock status. If the
Registrar does not provide a means to allow a Registered Name Holder to
remove the lock status themselves, then Registrar must facilitate removing
the lock within 5 calendar days / 5 working days / 10 business days of
receiving a request from the Registered Name Holder.

Questions for the members of the WG:

1/ Do you support the proposed modification to change denial reason #7?

*       If yes, please indicate which timeframe you would support: 5
calendar days, 5 working days or 10 business days 
*       If no, please provide your feedback as to why you do not support the
proposed modification and, if possible, provide an alternative
recommendation for consideration

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature