<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Your feedback requested - Issue E
- To: "Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Your feedback requested - Issue E
- From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 01:16:04 -0700
Issue E: Whether, and if so, how best to clarify denial reason #7: A domain
name was already in "lock status" provided that the Registrar provides a
readily accessible and reasonable means for the Registered Name Holder to
remove the lock status.
Proposed modification of denial reason #7:
Prior to receipt of the transfer request, the domain name was locked pursuant
to the Registrar’s published security policy or at the direction of the
Registered Name Holder provided that the Registrar includes in its registration
agreement the terms and conditions upon which it locks domains and further that
the Registrar provides a readily accessible and reasonable means for the
Registered Name Holder to remove the lock status. If the Registrar does not
provide a means to allow a Registered Name Holder to remove the lock status
themselves, then Registrar must facilitate removing the lock within 5 calendar
days / 5 working days / 10 business days of receiving a request from the
Registered Name Holder.
Questions for the members of the WG:
1/ Do you support the proposed modification to change denial reason #7?
* If yes, please indicate which timeframe you would support: 5 calendar
days, 5 working days or 10 business days
* If no, please provide your feedback as to why you do not support the
proposed modification and, if possible, provide an alternative recommendation
for consideration
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|