Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Your feedback requested - Issue E

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

add me to the "5 calendar days" pile.

thanks,

mikey


On May 5, 2010, at 3:16 AM, Marika Konings wrote:

> Issue E: Whether, and if so, how best to clarify denial reason #7: A domain 
> name was already in "lock status" provided that the Registrar provides a 
> readily accessible and reasonable means for the Registered Name Holder to 
> remove the lock status.
> 
> Proposed modification of denial reason #7: 
> Prior to receipt of the transfer request, the domain name was locked pursuant 
> to the Registrar’s published security policy or at the direction of the 
> Registered Name Holder provided that the Registrar includes in its 
> registration agreement the terms and conditions upon which it locks domains 
> and further that the Registrar provides a readily accessible and reasonable 
> means for the Registered Name Holder to remove the lock status. If the 
> Registrar does not provide a means to allow a Registered Name Holder to 
> remove the lock status themselves, then Registrar must facilitate removing 
> the lock within 5 calendar days / 5 working days / 10 business days of 
> receiving a request from the Registered Name Holder.
> 
> Questions for the members of the WG:
> 
> 1/ Do you support the proposed modification to change denial reason #7?
> If yes, please indicate which timeframe you would support: 5 calendar days, 5 
> working days or 10 business days
> If no, please provide your feedback as to why you do not support the proposed 
> modification and, if possible, provide an alternative recommendation for 
> consideration

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)