ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-irtp-b-jun09]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Your feedback requested - Issue E

  • To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Your feedback requested - Issue E
  • From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 13:57:14 +0000

I was a proponent of working days, but realise the issues with that, so I'd go 
with 7 calendar days (which I know isn't an option)


On 11 May 2010, at 14:51, Mike O'Connor wrote:

> add me to the "5 calendar days" pile.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> On May 5, 2010, at 3:16 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
> 
>> Issue E: Whether, and if so, how best to clarify denial reason #7: A domain 
>> name was already in "lock status" provided that the Registrar provides a 
>> readily accessible and reasonable means for the Registered Name Holder to 
>> remove the lock status.
>> 
>> Proposed modification of denial reason #7: 
>> Prior to receipt of the transfer request, the domain name was locked 
>> pursuant to the Registrar’s published security policy or at the direction of 
>> the Registered Name Holder provided that the Registrar includes in its 
>> registration agreement the terms and conditions upon which it locks domains 
>> and further that the Registrar provides a readily accessible and reasonable 
>> means for the Registered Name Holder to remove the lock status. If the 
>> Registrar does not provide a means to allow a Registered Name Holder to 
>> remove the lock status themselves, then Registrar must facilitate removing 
>> the lock within 5 calendar days / 5 working days / 10 business days of 
>> receiving a request from the Registered Name Holder.
>> 
>> Questions for the members of the WG:
>> 
>> 1/ Do you support the proposed modification to change denial reason #7?
>>      • If yes, please indicate which timeframe you would support: 5 calendar 
>> days, 5 working days or 10 business days
>>      • If no, please provide your feedback as to why you do not support the 
>> proposed modification and, if possible, provide an alternative 
>> recommendation for consideration
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109  
> fax           866-280-2356  
> web   www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
> Google, etc.)
> 

Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
US: 213-233-1612 
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy