Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Your feedback requested - Issue E

[Baudouin SCHOMBE <b.schombe@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sincerly we have many difficult to understand and to make difference between
"5 working days", "5 busness days"," 5 busness day".

Can somebody explain fluently different between those days.

Baudouin

2010/5/11, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> I was a proponent of working days, but realise the issues with that, so I'd
> go with 7 calendar days (which I know isn't an option)
>
>
>
> On 11 May 2010, at 14:51, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>
> > add me to the "5 calendar days" pile.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > mikey
> >
> >
> > On May 5, 2010, at 3:16 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
> >
> >> Issue E: Whether, and if so, how best to clarify denial reason #7: A
> domain name was already in "lock status" provided that the Registrar
> provides a readily accessible and reasonable means for the Registered Name
> Holder to remove the lock status.
> >>
> >> Proposed modification of denial reason #7:
> >> Prior to receipt of the transfer request, the domain name was locked
> pursuant to the Registrar’s published security policy or at the direction of
> the Registered Name Holder provided that the Registrar includes in its
> registration agreement the terms and conditions upon which it locks domains
> and further that the Registrar provides a readily accessible and reasonable
> means for the Registered Name Holder to remove the lock status. If the
> Registrar does not provide a means to allow a Registered Name Holder to
> remove the lock status themselves, then Registrar must facilitate removing
> the lock within 5 calendar days / 5 working days / 10 business days of
> receiving a request from the Registered Name Holder.
> >>
> >> Questions for the members of the WG:
> >>
> >> 1/ Do you support the proposed modification to change denial reason #7?
> >>      • If yes, please indicate which timeframe you would support: 5
> calendar days, 5 working days or 10 business days
> >>      • If no, please provide your feedback as to why you do not support
> the proposed modification and, if possible, provide an alternative
> recommendation for consideration
> >
> > - - - - - - - - -
> > phone         651-647-6109
> > fax           866-280-2356
> > web   www.haven2.com
> > handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
> Google, etc.)
> >
>
>
> Mr Michele Neylon
> Blacknight Solutions
> Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
> ICANN Accredited Registrar
> http://www.blacknight.com/
> http://blog.blacknight.com/
> http://mneylon.tel
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
> US: 213-233-1612
> UK: 0844 484 9361
> Locall: 1850 929 929
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
> -------------------------------
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
>
>
>


-- 
SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN
COORDONNATEUR DU CENTRE AFRICAIN D'ECHANGE CULTUREL (CAFEC)
COORDONNATEUR NATIONAL REPRONTIC
MEMBRE FACILITATEUR GAID AFRIQUE
GNSO and NCUC MEMBER (ICANN)

Téléphone mobile: +243998983491/+243999334571
                           +243811980914
email:                   b.schombe@xxxxxxxxx
blog:                     http://akimambo.unblog.fr
siège temporaire : Boulevard du 30 juin Immeuble   Royal, Entrée A,7e
niveau.