<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Further details comment 38
- To: "Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Further details comment 38
- From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 04:52:10 -0700
Dear All,
As discussed during our meeting on Tuesday, please find below the relevant
paragraph in relation to comment 38 in the public comment review tool.
With best regards,
Marika
============================
>From http://forum.icann.org/lists/irtp-b-initial-report/msg00008.html
Also the "ad hoc" locks that are violation of existing transfers policy need to
be eliminated. Registrars should be proactive about security, rather than
misusing the locks in order to prevent legitimate registrars from transferring
to the registrar of their choice (which might be a far more secure registrar
than the "losing" registrar). The desire for a new registrant to change to
their own preferred registrar immediately should not be blocked by losing
registrars that wish to hold a domain name hostage.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|