RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For Final Review - IRTP Part B Proposed Final Report

["Steele, Barbara" <BSteele@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Marika,

Thank you for all of your hard work on the document.  I have reviewed it and
have a couple of comments relating to the recommendation of requesting an
issues report on the requirement of "thick" WHOIS for all incumbent gTLDs
that are noted in the attached.  Other than that, I think that the document
looks good.  Thanks.

 

 


        

Barbara Steele



        

 

 

From: owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 5:56 AM
To: Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For Final Review - IRTP Part B Proposed Final
Report

 

Dear All,

 

Please find attached for your review an updated version of the IRTP Part B
Proposed Final Report, incorporating the edits and suggestions discussed at
yesterday's meeting. I've also attached a clean version for those of you
that prefer to review without all the redlines. We are still cleaning up the
attendance sheet which will be linked in the report and will add any missing
data in relation to attendance before the report is finalized.

 

Please send any comments, edits, suggestions to the mailing list at the
latest, but preferably before, close of business (wherever you are) on
Friday 18 March.

 

Thanks,

 

Marika

Attachment: IRTP Part B Proposed Final Report - Clean - Updated 16 February 2011-BKS Edits.doc
Description: MS-Word document

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature