[gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Consensus call - EAC documents
Dear All, As discussed during yesterday's meeting, please find attached the proposed final language of the EAC and FAQ for inclusion in the Final Report. With regard to the comments submitted by Barbara yesterday (see http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-irtp-b-jun09/msg00734.html): * "The registries could agree to the 5 day turn around for undoing a transfer" - The EAC refers to section 6 of the IRTP in relation to the requirements for a transfer-undo. Section 6 of the IRTP states that 'The Registry Operator must undo the transfer within five (5) calendar days of receipt of the notice', so I don't think there is a need for further changes to the EAC to address this issue. * "It should not be up to the registry operators to reset the domain name to its original state. Instead, the registries would be willing to update the registrar of record to its previous state and once that is done, the registrar of record would be responsible for resetting the other information such as name servers." - Section 6 of the IRTP states that in case of a transfer-undo 'the transfer will be reversed and the domain name reset to its original state'. It seems that the registry request differs from what is current practice in relation to a transfer-undo. Is there support from the WG for this proposal from the RySG? If yes, is this something that can be included as part of the implementation notes? If you don't support this proposal, please explain why. If you have any other objections or concerns, please share these with the mailing list ahead of next week's IRTP Part B WG meeting, otherwise the WG will assume there is consensus regarding the language in the attached documents. With best regards, Marika Attachment:
EAC FAQ - proposed Final - 18 May 2011.doc Attachment:
IRTP Emergency Action Channel - Proposed Final - 18 May 2011.doc |