RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For FINAL review - IRTP Part B Final Report - deadline 29 May 2011

["Diaz, Paul" <pdiaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I support these changes.  Thanks, Mikey and James.

Best, P


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 9:30 AM
To: James M. Bladel
Cc: Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx; Marika Konings
Subject: Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For FINAL review - IRTP Part B Final
Report - deadline 29 May 2011


ah.  yep - i agree with your thought James.  much more neutral
language....

so the revised-new version would be;

"A TEAC must be requested in a timely manner, within a reasonable period
of time following the alleged unauthorized transfer."

m

On May 25, 2011, at 8:21 AM, James M. Bladel wrote:

> Good catch, Mikey.  
> 
> One other thought:  Do we want to say "unauthorized loss" when really
> all we have is a claim or suspicion at this point?  Perhaps "alleged
> unauthorized transfer"?
> 
> Am I over-thinking this?
> 
> Thanks--
> 
> J.
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For FINAL review - IRTP Part B Final
> Report - deadline 29 May 2011
> From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, May 25, 2011 8:14 am
> To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> hi all,
> 
> i've attached a copy of the draft with a few changes. i started with a
> clean draft so's to highlight the little nits i picked out.
> 
> there's only one substantive change. i made the following change in
the
> three places that this sentence appeared...
> 
> old:
> 
> "A TEAC must be requested by the registrant in a timely manner, within
a
> reasonable period of time following the unauthorized loss of a domain"
> 
> new:
> 
> "A TEAC must be requested in a timely manner, within a reasonable
period
> of time following the unauthorized loss of a domain"
> 
> so i'm striking the words "by the registrant" -- the reason i'm
> suggesting this is that the TEAC cannot be requested by the
registrant,
> only the registrar.
> 
> all the rest of the changes are mostly just nits or formatting. i also
> highlight one section that should be reviewed once Simonetta and James
> finish up on their language.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> 
> On May 25, 2011, at 4:45 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
> 
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> You'll find posted on the wiki
(https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtpb/For+Review+by+29+May+2011
) the latest version of the Final Report. This version includes the
changes discussed on our call yesterday (including amongst others:
changing Emergency Action Channel to Transfer Emergency Action Contact;
updated notes to reflect WG discussion and conclusion on 60-day lock
recommendation; updated TEAC FAQ).
>> 
>> This version does not include updated language to reflect that the
60-day lock should be considered as part of the Issue Report on 'change
of control' (recommendation #4) as discussed yesterday, which will be
circulated later today on the mailing list for your review and comment
by James / Simonetta. In addition, it does not include any language
Barbara may submit to convey that in the case of a transfer undo
registries will update the registrar of record to its previous state.
>> 
>> Apart from the updated recommendation in relation to the 60-day lock
which you will have the opportunity to review separately, the report
notes that all the recommendations listed currently in the report have
the full consensus support from the Working Group.
>> 
>> Please review the latest version of the Final Report. You are
encouraged to share any comments/edits/suggestions you may have as soon
as possible but no later than COB 29 May 2011. The objective is to
submit this report to the GNSO Council and for publication on Monday 30
May 2011.
>> 
>> With best regards,
>> 
>> Marika
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone 651-647-6109 
> fax 866-280-2356 
> web http://www.haven2.com
> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
Google,
> etc.)
> 

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
etc.)