ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-irtp-b-jun09]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For FINAL review - IRTP Part B Final Report - deadline 29 May 2011

  • To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For FINAL review - IRTP Part B Final Report - deadline 29 May 2011
  • From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 13:32:53 +0000


On 25 May 2011, at 14:29, Mike O'Connor wrote:

> 
> ah.  yep - i agree with your thought James.  much more neutral language….
> 
> so the revised-new version would be;
> 
> "A TEAC must be requested in a timely manner, within a reasonable period of 
> time following the alleged unauthorized transfer."

Sounds good

> 
> m
> 
> On May 25, 2011, at 8:21 AM, James M. Bladel wrote:
> 
>> Good catch, Mikey.  
>> 
>> One other thought:  Do we want to say "unauthorized loss" when really
>> all we have is a claim or suspicion at this point?  Perhaps "alleged
>> unauthorized transfer"?
>> 
>> Am I over-thinking this?
>> 
>> Thanks--
>> 
>> J.
>> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For FINAL review - IRTP Part B Final
>> Report - deadline 29 May 2011
>> From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Wed, May 25, 2011 8:14 am
>> To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> hi all,
>> 
>> i've attached a copy of the draft with a few changes. i started with a
>> clean draft so's to highlight the little nits i picked out.
>> 
>> there's only one substantive change. i made the following change in the
>> three places that this sentence appeared…
>> 
>> old:
>> 
>> "A TEAC must be requested by the registrant in a timely manner, within a
>> reasonable period of time following the unauthorized loss of a domain"
>> 
>> new:
>> 
>> "A TEAC must be requested in a timely manner, within a reasonable period
>> of time following the unauthorized loss of a domain"
>> 
>> so i'm striking the words "by the registrant" -- the reason i'm
>> suggesting this is that the TEAC cannot be requested by the registrant,
>> only the registrar.
>> 
>> all the rest of the changes are mostly just nits or formatting. i also
>> highlight one section that should be reviewed once Simonetta and James
>> finish up on their language.
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>> mikey
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On May 25, 2011, at 4:45 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear All,
>>> 
>>> You'll find posted on the wiki 
>>> (https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtpb/For+Review+by+29+May+2011) 
>>> the latest version of the Final Report. This version includes the changes 
>>> discussed on our call yesterday (including amongst others: changing 
>>> Emergency Action Channel to Transfer Emergency Action Contact; updated 
>>> notes to reflect WG discussion and conclusion on 60-day lock 
>>> recommendation; updated TEAC FAQ).
>>> 
>>> This version does not include updated language to reflect that the 60-day 
>>> lock should be considered as part of the Issue Report on 'change of 
>>> control' (recommendation #4) as discussed yesterday, which will be 
>>> circulated later today on the mailing list for your review and comment by 
>>> James / Simonetta. In addition, it does not include any language Barbara 
>>> may submit to convey that in the case of a transfer undo registries will 
>>> update the registrar of record to its previous state.
>>> 
>>> Apart from the updated recommendation in relation to the 60-day lock which 
>>> you will have the opportunity to review separately, the report notes that 
>>> all the recommendations listed currently in the report have the full 
>>> consensus support from the Working Group.
>>> 
>>> Please review the latest version of the Final Report. You are encouraged to 
>>> share any comments/edits/suggestions you may have as soon as possible but 
>>> no later than COB 29 May 2011. The objective is to submit this report to 
>>> the GNSO Council and for publication on Monday 30 May 2011.
>>> 
>>> With best regards,
>>> 
>>> Marika
>> 
>> - - - - - - - - -
>> phone 651-647-6109 
>> fax 866-280-2356 
>> web http://www.haven2.com
>> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
>> etc.)
>> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109  
> fax           866-280-2356  
> web   http://www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
> Google, etc.)
> 
> 

Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://b.log.ie/
http://invadeeurope.eu/
http://www.gettingbusinessonline.ie/
http://rss.me/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
US: 213-233-1612 
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon

PS: Check out our latest offers on domains & hosting: http://domainoffers.me/
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845










<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy