<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For FINAL review - IRTP Part B Final Report - deadline 29 May 2011
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For FINAL review - IRTP Part B Final Report - deadline 29 May 2011
- From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 13:32:53 +0000
On 25 May 2011, at 14:29, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>
> ah. yep - i agree with your thought James. much more neutral language….
>
> so the revised-new version would be;
>
> "A TEAC must be requested in a timely manner, within a reasonable period of
> time following the alleged unauthorized transfer."
Sounds good
>
> m
>
> On May 25, 2011, at 8:21 AM, James M. Bladel wrote:
>
>> Good catch, Mikey.
>>
>> One other thought: Do we want to say "unauthorized loss" when really
>> all we have is a claim or suspicion at this point? Perhaps "alleged
>> unauthorized transfer"?
>>
>> Am I over-thinking this?
>>
>> Thanks--
>>
>> J.
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For FINAL review - IRTP Part B Final
>> Report - deadline 29 May 2011
>> From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Wed, May 25, 2011 8:14 am
>> To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> hi all,
>>
>> i've attached a copy of the draft with a few changes. i started with a
>> clean draft so's to highlight the little nits i picked out.
>>
>> there's only one substantive change. i made the following change in the
>> three places that this sentence appeared…
>>
>> old:
>>
>> "A TEAC must be requested by the registrant in a timely manner, within a
>> reasonable period of time following the unauthorized loss of a domain"
>>
>> new:
>>
>> "A TEAC must be requested in a timely manner, within a reasonable period
>> of time following the unauthorized loss of a domain"
>>
>> so i'm striking the words "by the registrant" -- the reason i'm
>> suggesting this is that the TEAC cannot be requested by the registrant,
>> only the registrar.
>>
>> all the rest of the changes are mostly just nits or formatting. i also
>> highlight one section that should be reviewed once Simonetta and James
>> finish up on their language.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> mikey
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 25, 2011, at 4:45 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> You'll find posted on the wiki
>>> (https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtpb/For+Review+by+29+May+2011)
>>> the latest version of the Final Report. This version includes the changes
>>> discussed on our call yesterday (including amongst others: changing
>>> Emergency Action Channel to Transfer Emergency Action Contact; updated
>>> notes to reflect WG discussion and conclusion on 60-day lock
>>> recommendation; updated TEAC FAQ).
>>>
>>> This version does not include updated language to reflect that the 60-day
>>> lock should be considered as part of the Issue Report on 'change of
>>> control' (recommendation #4) as discussed yesterday, which will be
>>> circulated later today on the mailing list for your review and comment by
>>> James / Simonetta. In addition, it does not include any language Barbara
>>> may submit to convey that in the case of a transfer undo registries will
>>> update the registrar of record to its previous state.
>>>
>>> Apart from the updated recommendation in relation to the 60-day lock which
>>> you will have the opportunity to review separately, the report notes that
>>> all the recommendations listed currently in the report have the full
>>> consensus support from the Working Group.
>>>
>>> Please review the latest version of the Final Report. You are encouraged to
>>> share any comments/edits/suggestions you may have as soon as possible but
>>> no later than COB 29 May 2011. The objective is to submit this report to
>>> the GNSO Council and for publication on Monday 30 May 2011.
>>>
>>> With best regards,
>>>
>>> Marika
>>
>> - - - - - - - - -
>> phone 651-647-6109
>> fax 866-280-2356
>> web http://www.haven2.com
>> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
>> etc.)
>>
>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone 651-647-6109
> fax 866-280-2356
> web http://www.haven2.com
> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
> Google, etc.)
>
>
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://b.log.ie/
http://invadeeurope.eu/
http://www.gettingbusinessonline.ie/
http://rss.me/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
US: 213-233-1612
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
PS: Check out our latest offers on domains & hosting: http://domainoffers.me/
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|