[gnso-irtpc] Mp3 / IRTP C PDP / 24 January 2012
- To: "gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-irtpc] Mp3 / IRTP C PDP / 24 January 2012
- From: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:43:22 -0800
The next IRTP C working group call will be held on Tuesday 31 January at 15:00
Please find the MP3 recording of the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) C
working group call held on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 @ 1500 UTC on page:
The transcript will be posted on the same page.
The contents of the AC chat can be found at the bottom of this email.
James Bladel -co-chair
Avri Doria - co-chair
Mike O'Connor - CBUC
Barbara Knight - RySG
Bob Mountain - Registrar SG
Zahid Jamil - CBUC
Kevin Erdman - IPC
Michele Neylon - RrSG
Rob Villeneuve - RrSG
Chris Chaplow - CBUC
Philip Corwin - CBUC
Matt Serlin - RrSG
Paul Diaz- RySG
Erick Iriarte - NCUC
Simonetta Batteiger - Registrar SG
Jonathan Tenenbaum - RrSG
IRTP C Members:
Erick Iriarte Ahon
James M. Bladel
Wiki Space: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtppdpwg/Home
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list
Nathalie Peregrine for
AC CHAT ROOM 24 January 2011:
Marika Konings:IRTP Part C WG Meeting - 24 January 2012
Michele Neylon:todays "fun"
Bladel:Irish Spring. :)
Barbara Knight-RySG:I may need to attend remotely
Barbara Knight-RySG:Will that be an optin
Chris Chaplow:Chris abstains as unfortunately will not be attending CR in
person but by remote
Bladel:Barbara & Chris: We will ensure that there is remote participation
avri:yes, thursday is best for inviting ccNSO, and Wed is best for
accomodating all members.
Barbara Knight-RySG:Thanks James.
Marika Konings:Yes, remote participation details will be circulated prior to
Marika Konings:Rob Villeneuve and Bob Mountain have joined the call
Bob Mountain:Try moving one into the country, post 911 you meet with an armed
federal agent who goes over your paperwork with a fine toothed comb....
Mikey O'Connor:no -- she's just responding to the charter
Mikey O'Connor:It should also include a review of locking procedures, as
described in Reasons for Denial #8 and #9, with an aim to balance legitimate
transfer activity and security.
Marika Konings:So did I understand correctly that even though #8 is optional
for registrars, it is defacto required as the registry systems are set up as
Michele Neylon:yes and no
Michele Neylon:I think we're confusing locks
Bladel:Marika: That was my understanding...
Rob Villeneuve:Thanks everyone. Thanks James.