<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-irtpc] Chat transcript IRTP Part C F2F meeting
- To: "gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-irtpc] Chat transcript IRTP Part C F2F meeting
- From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:29:32 -0700
For your information, please find below the chat transcript of yesterday's IRTP
Part C F2F meeting.
With best regards,
Marika
On 14/03/12 10:01, "Marika Konings"
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Marika Konings:Good morning everyone. The IRTP Part C Working Group meeting
will get started shortly.
Rob Golding (othello):morning Marika - are you enjoying 'Rica ?
Marika Konings:Yes, very much so
Rob Golding (othello):I'd be sad to have stayed in london - if only it wasn't
gloriously sunny and ~20degrees here today :)
Marika Konings:Wow, that sounds nice!
Rob Golding (othello):not dialed in yet
Rob Golding (othello):calling in a sec
Rob Golding (othello):(load room at the mo here)
Rob Golding (othello):loud even
Michele Neylon:morning
Michele Neylon:Ah Ms Salter
Kelly Salter:Morning Mr Neylon
Erick Irairte:Good Morning :)
Michele Neylon:Kelly - so you going to start playing with us now? :)
Kelly Salter:I thought i'd should listen in... prepare myself for Prague :)
Michele Neylon::)
Rob Golding (othello):dont start playing with Michele - he's like a rubiks
cube, once you tsrta you'll never put him down ;)
Rob Golding (othello):start - damn wireless keyboard
Michele Neylon:Rob - lol
Sam:I agree with Rob
Sam:ICANN should be trying to standardise the transfer criteria
Sam:accredited registrars should be following the same transfer rules
Rob Golding (othello):@sam - standards are good :)
Sam:Certainly makes integration between different registrars easier. With the
new TLDs coming it seems like the perfect time to rethink this process and
ensuring that everybody is clear in terms of locking, auth codes and other
transfer prohibitations
Rob Golding (othello):to clarify my point/question - it _appears_ that
registries are applying their own rules/practices to the "change of registrant"
processes, but locking the domains for "a period" from inter-registrar-transfer
after certain updates - PIR/ORG appear to lock the domain for 60 days after
changes to contacts for example, we need clarification from the registries what
they do (if anything) and (a) publish that so everyone knows and (b) potetially
have it changed inline with the final report/recommendations
Rob Golding (othello):such actions increase our support load in terms of
clients wanting to transfer in/out, especially in line with WDRP emails, they
login, update, and then find they cant move the domain if they want to
Rob Golding (othello):current registered name holder, replacemnet registered
name holder
Michele Neylon:ooh I like that
Rob Golding (othello):itra-reg "transfers" - where possible / available -
it's easy to move from one enom reseller to another, it's ngh-on-impossible to
move from one logicbox s/ware user to another without a inter-reg transfer, as
teh software doenst allow it (in most circumstances), and with others, even
moving to an alternative "account" to change payment details is treated as a
transfer
Rob Golding (othello):It's certainly a "benefit" to usrs of certain systems,
but not available at all of them
Rob Golding (othello):dropping off the call, sticking around on adobe,
turning speakers back up :)
Marika Konings:Any remote questions / comments are of course also welcome!
Rob Golding (othello):@mikey - the £1+vat fee only applies where you are
updating the owenrship (change of control). there is also a £10+vat charge if
you get *nominet* to transfer the domain between registrar (but registrars can
do that immediately and without charge to them or the registrant) - call a TAG
Release - which _optionally_ the receiving registrar can hold for manual
accept/reject (handshaking) or always reject or always accept
Rob Golding (othello):@mikey - *only* Nominet can do the change of control
(ownership) as they dont allow registrars to update the regsitrant name fields
on the domain - part of the nominet-registrant legal agreemnet entered on
registering a .uk
Rob Golding (othello):@Mikey - 5 day IRTP prescribe limit is 5 days from
acknowledgement by the registry, afetr acknowledgement by the losing registrar,
each of which can add a few days - my experience is 2 days min (as say verisign
only send out the notices to the gaining registrar @ 5am everyday) and 9 days
(longest) with an average of 5-6 days
Barbara Knight - RySG:James, Will there be call in details for the meeting
with the ccNSO?
Michele Neylon:I think they have remote stuff
Michele Neylon:so you can foloow it
Michele Neylon:but let's see what Marika says
Mikey O'Connor -- ISP type guy:http://costarica43.icann.org/node/29629
Michele Neylon:http://icann.adobeconnect.com/sjo43-bouganvillea
Barbara Knight - RySG:thanks gentlemen :-)
Marika Konings:Yes, there should be audiocast, but there is no phone bridge
Michele Neylon:ah ha
Marika Konings:there is also an Adobe Connect room, so feel free to post any
comments / questions there and I'll try to raise those during the meeting, if
possible.
Barbara Knight - RySG:thanks Marika
Marika Konings:thanks all!
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|