<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-irtpc] new mind-map is up on the site
- To: IRTPC Working Group <gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpc] new mind-map is up on the site
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:43:30 -0400
On 3 Apr 2012, at 11:15, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>
> hi all,
>
> i've posted the latest version of the mind-map to the site, here's the link;
>
>
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtppdpwg/Mind+maps+of+teleconference+discussions
Thanks. as Alwasy.
>
> sorry i was so slow on the uptake, but that whole FOA vs AuthCode
> conversation took me completely by surprise. it would be helpful is somebody
> would dig in and do a little research on what the "correct"
> definitions/roles/uses of AuthInfo vs FOA codes are before the next call.
Actually i thought you reacted quite quickly. We should have warned you we
might need the Mind Map, but then we seems to use it most meetings as it has
become an indispensable tool.
You are a victim of your own success.
>
> let me be clear on one thing, and one thing only. i do not want to see a
> solution where a "stale" piece of information can be exploited to steal a
> domain name. i don't care how it's fixed, i don't care who does what, i
> don't care what services registrars offer to make meeting the requirements
> easier for registrants. but i'm not going to accept a solution based on the
> argument that security is too hard to implement in an easy-to-use way, so
> we're going to leave registrants handle that risk on their own.
as a participant from the registrant classes, and momentarily doffing my
co-chair hat, I think I can agree with this.
avri
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|