<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[FWD: RE: [gnso-irtpc] new mind-map is up on the site]
- To: "IRTPC Working Group" <gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [FWD: RE: [gnso-irtpc] new mind-map is up on the site]
- From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:49:10 -0700
<html><body><span style="font-family:Arial; color:#000000;
font-size:10pt;"><div>Sorry, didn't hit "reply
all"</div><div><br></div><div>J.</div><div><br></div>
<blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid
blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size:10pt; color:black;
font-family:verdana;">
<div id="wmQuoteWrapper">
-------- Original Message --------<br>
Subject: RE: [gnso-irtpc] new mind-map is up on the site<br>
From: "James M. Bladel" <<a
href="mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx";>jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx</a>><br>
Date: Tue, April 03, 2012 11:04 am<br>
To: "Avri Doria" <<a href="mailto:avri@xxxxxxx";>avri@xxxxxxx</a>><br>
<br>
<span style="font-family:Arial; color:#000000; font-size:10pt;"><div>Thanks,
Mikey. It was an impromptu request and sorry for putting you on the
spot. Just wanted to ensure that we used our Approach document for
guidance as we opened this new topic.</div><div><br>Really appreciate all you
do to keep the notes / mindmaps, and thanks for being so
responsive.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>J.</div><div><br></div>
<blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid
blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size:10pt; color:black;
font-family:verdana;"> <div id="wmQuoteWrapper"> -------- Original Message
--------<br> Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpc] new mind-map is up on the site<br> From:
Avri Doria <<a target="_blank"
href="mailto:avri@xxxxxxx";>avri@xxxxxxx</a>><br> Date: Tue, April 03, 2012
10:43 am<br> To: IRTPC Working Group <<a target="_blank"
href="mailto:gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx";>gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx</a>><br> <br> <br>
<br> On 3 Apr 2012, at 11:15, Mike O'Connor wrote:<br> <br> > <br> > hi
all,<br> > <br> > i've posted the latest version of the mind-map to the
site, here's the link;<br> > <br> > <a target="_blank"
href="https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtppdpwg/Mind+maps+of+teleconference+discussions";>https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtppdpwg/Mind+maps+of+teleconference+discussions</a><br>
<br> Thanks. as Alwasy.<br> <br> > <br> > sorry i was so slow on the
uptake, but that whole FOA vs AuthCode conversation took me completely by
surprise. it would be helpful is somebody would dig in and do a little research
on what the "correct" definitions/roles/uses of AuthInfo vs FOA codes are
before the next call. <br> <br> Actually i thought you reacted quite quickly.
We should have warned you we might need the Mind Map, but then we seems to use
it most meetings as it has become an indispensable tool. <br> <br> You are a
victim of your own success.<br> <br> > <br> > let me be clear on one
thing, and one thing only. i do not want to see a solution where a "stale"
piece of information can be exploited to steal a domain name. i don't care how
it's fixed, i don't care who does what, i don't care what services registrars
offer to make meeting the requirements easier for registrants. but i'm not
going to accept a solution based on the argument that security is too hard to
implement in an easy-to-use way, so we're going to leave registrants handle
that risk on their own. <br> <br> as a participant from the registrant classes,
and momentarily doffing my co-chair hat, I think I can agree with this.<br>
<br> avri<br> <br> <br> <br> </div> </blockquote></span>
</div>
</blockquote></span></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|