RE: [gnso-irtpc] questions for the IANA-number question

["Sedo :: Simonetta Batteiger" <simonetta@xxxxxxxx>]

Marika/James: I don't recall us actually reviewing that Issue Report on the 
IANA item, did we? That might be a good item to put back on the agenda for one 
of the coming calls...
Simonetta

From: owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 4:51 PM
To: IRTPC Working Group
Subject: [gnso-irtpc] questions for the IANA-number question

here's that list questions we asked long ago


Understand why we're looking at this question -- what problems are we trying to 
solve

  *   + - Review Issue Report

o    Some issues were raised a long time ago -- are these questions still 
valid, given other measures that have been taken in the intervening time

  *   Identify justification, benefits and costs and how we demonstrate them
  *   + - Identify impacts/harms to registrars in addition to registries

     *   Are there material effects that result?
     *   Do those expand to registrants
     *   "Why are we doing this?"
     *   Identify streamlining/scaleability facets of the process

  *   Explore security questions/issues
  *   Look for reasons why not to do this -- include in the instructions for 
stakeholder feedback
  *   Why aren't they being used, level of effort required to change.
- - - - - - - - -
phone      651-647-6109
fax                           866-280-2356
web         http://www.haven2.com
handle      OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 
etc.)