Re: [gnso-irtpc] Reminder: For Final Review - IRTP Part C Initial Report

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

hi all,

i've taken a look at this draft (through the fog of a late night of rock
n'roll jamming) and i support it as written.

a special thanks to Bob for carrying the ball while i was traveling
yesterday.  i think his language nicely captures the puzzler that remains
and i'm pretty hopeful that we can solve it before we're done.

mikey


On Fri, June 1, 2012 5:32 am, Marika Konings wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> As a reminder, today, Friday COB, is the deadline for substantive comments
> on the Initial Report. You'll find the latest version, which includes the
> edits submitted by Bob to the mailing list yesterday, posted on the wiki
> (https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtppdpwg/For+review). You'll
> also find posted there the proposed announcement for the public comment
> forum which is also scheduled to open coming Monday 4 June.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marika
>
> From: Marika Konings
> <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
> To: IRTPC Working Group
> <gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [gnso-irtpc] For Final Review - IRTP Part C Initial Report
>
> Dear All,
>
> Please find attached and posted on the wiki
> (https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtppdpwg/For+review) the 'final'
> version of the Initial Report for your review. I've accepted all the
> changes in the previous version so it is easier to see the changes made.
> These include:
>
>  *   Updated the executive summary
>  *   Added a paragraph on the review of reason for denial 8 and 9
> following the discussions by the sub-team on this topic and the WG
> deliberations on a possible 60-day lock
>  *   Added attendance information
>  *   Inserted the language and proposed recommendations for Charter
> Questions A, B and C. Please note that for Charter Question B, I've
> included the language as suggested by Bob yesterday, noting that Mikey
> and Bob are still discussing possible additional changes.
>
> With regard to the timeline for review, the good news is that I learned
> yesterday that the deadline for publication for the Prague meeting is
> actually Monday 4 June, so that gives the WG a couple of extra days. In
> light of that, in consultation with Avri and James, we would like to
> propose the following timeline for publication:
>
>  *   Friday 1 June COB (wherever you are) – Deadline for any substantive
> comments / edits, to be shared with the mailing list
>  *   Sunday 3 June COB(wherever you are) – Deadline for any minor edits /
> corrections, to be shared with the mailing list
>  *   Monday 4 June – Publication of Initial Report and opening of public
> comment forum. Taking into account the 30 days + 21 days, the forum would
> close on 25 July.
>
>  We hope this works for everyone. Please share any comments / suggestions
> and/or edits you may have with the mailing list as soon as possible.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marika
>


sent from webmail