[gnso-irtpc] RE: Reminder: For Final Review - IRTP Part C Initial Report
All, Thanks to everyone for all the great work. I have just one minor suggestion on Charter Question C. On page 34, I recommend the language be revised to be: "The WG expects that standardizing use of IANA IDs *could* simplify the domain name transfer process.", where 'will' has been changed to 'could'. Thank you, --Roy Dykes Product Management, Neustar From: owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 6:32 AM To: IRTPC Working Group Subject: [gnso-irtpc] Reminder: For Final Review - IRTP Part C Initial Report Importance: High Dear All, As a reminder, today, Friday COB, is the deadline for substantive comments on the Initial Report. You'll find the latest version, which includes the edits submitted by Bob to the mailing list yesterday, posted on the wiki (https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtppdpwg/For+review). You'll also find posted there the proposed announcement for the public comment forum which is also scheduled to open coming Monday 4 June. Thanks, Marika From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>> To: IRTPC Working Group <gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx>> Subject: [gnso-irtpc] For Final Review - IRTP Part C Initial Report Dear All, Please find attached and posted on the wiki (https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtppdpwg/For+review) the 'final' version of the Initial Report for your review. I've accepted all the changes in the previous version so it is easier to see the changes made. These include: * Updated the executive summary * Added a paragraph on the review of reason for denial 8 and 9 following the discussions by the sub-team on this topic and the WG deliberations on a possible 60-day lock * Added attendance information * Inserted the language and proposed recommendations for Charter Questions A, B and C. Please note that for Charter Question B, I've included the language as suggested by Bob yesterday, noting that Mikey and Bob are still discussing possible additional changes. With regard to the timeline for review, the good news is that I learned yesterday that the deadline for publication for the Prague meeting is actually Monday 4 June, so that gives the WG a couple of extra days. In light of that, in consultation with Avri and James, we would like to propose the following timeline for publication: * Friday 1 June COB (wherever you are) - Deadline for any substantive comments / edits, to be shared with the mailing list * Sunday 3 June COB(wherever you are) - Deadline for any minor edits / corrections, to be shared with the mailing list * Monday 4 June - Publication of Initial Report and opening of public comment forum. Taking into account the 30 days + 21 days, the forum would close on 25 July. We hope this works for everyone. Please share any comments / suggestions and/or edits you may have with the mailing list as soon as possible. Thanks, Marika Attachment:
IRTP Part C DRAFT Initial Report - Updated 31 May 2012 - Mtn Edits.docx
|