Re: [gnso-irtpc] RE: Reminder: For Final Review - IRTP Part C Initial Report

[Bob Mountain <bmountain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

+1

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2012, at 1:03 PM, "Dykes, Roy" <Roy.Dykes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> All,
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks to everyone for all the great work.
> 
> 
> 
> I have just one minor suggestion on Charter Question C.  On page 34, I 
> recommend the language be revised to be:
> 
> 
> 
> "The WG expects that standardizing use of IANA IDs *could* simplify the 
> domain name transfer process.", where 'will' has been changed to 'could'.
> 
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> --Roy Dykes
> 
> Product Management, Neustar
> 
> 
> 
> From: owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Marika Konings
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 6:32 AM
> To: IRTPC Working Group
> Subject: [gnso-irtpc] Reminder: For Final Review - IRTP Part C Initial Report
> Importance: High
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> As a reminder, today, Friday COB, is the deadline for substantive comments on 
> the Initial Report. You'll find the latest version, which includes the edits 
> submitted by Bob to the mailing list yesterday, posted on the wiki 
> (https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtppdpwg/For+review). You'll also 
> find posted there the proposed announcement for the public comment forum 
> which is also scheduled to open coming Monday 4 June.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Marika
> 
> From: Marika Konings 
> <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
> To: IRTPC Working Group <gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [gnso-irtpc] For Final Review - IRTP Part C Initial Report
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> Please find attached and posted on the wiki 
> (https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtppdpwg/For+review) the 'final' 
> version of the Initial Report for your review. I've accepted all the changes 
> in the previous version so it is easier to see the changes made. These 
> include:
> 
>  *   Updated the executive summary
>  *   Added a paragraph on the review of reason for denial 8 and 9 following 
> the discussions by the sub-team on this topic and the WG deliberations on a 
> possible 60-day lock
>  *   Added attendance information
>  *   Inserted the language and proposed recommendations for Charter Questions 
> A, B and C. Please note that for Charter Question B, I've included the 
> language as suggested by Bob yesterday, noting that Mikey and Bob are still 
> discussing possible additional changes.
> With regard to the timeline for review, the good news is that I learned 
> yesterday that the deadline for publication for the Prague meeting is 
> actually Monday 4 June, so that gives the WG a couple of extra days. In light 
> of that, in consultation with Avri and James, we would like to propose the 
> following timeline for publication:
> 
>  *   Friday 1 June COB (wherever you are) – Deadline for any substantive 
> comments / edits, to be shared with the mailing list
>  *   Sunday 3 June COB(wherever you are) – Deadline for any minor edits / 
> corrections, to be shared with the mailing list
>  *   Monday 4 June – Publication of Initial Report and opening of public 
> comment forum. Taking into account the 30 days + 21 days, the forum would 
> close on 25 July.
> We hope this works for everyone. Please share any comments / suggestions 
> and/or edits you may have with the mailing list as soon as possible.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Marika
> <IRTP Part C DRAFT Initial Report - Updated 31 May 2012 - Mtn Edits.docx>