ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-irtpc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-irtpc] Action items IRTP Part C

  • To: "gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-irtpc] Action items IRTP Part C
  • From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 06:02:12 -0700

Dear All,

As discussed during yesterday's meeting, please find attached for final review 
the public comment review tool. I've updated the document to reflect 
yesterday's discussions as well as cleaned up some of the text. If you have any 
comments / edits, please share those with the mailing list ahead of next week's 
meeting.

With regard to the open discussion items resulting from the review of the 
public comments, I've identified the following:

Recommendation #1

 1.  Document a visual representation of the transfer process [Note: in 
progress. If you are interested in participating in this effort, see 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-irtpc/msg00342.html]
 2.  Further consideration of the proposed change of registrant policy and 
suggested restrictions for a change of registrar immediately following a change 
of registrant (should there be a 60 day restriction, should both parties be 
allowed to opt out of 60 day transfer restriction, or should default be no 
restrictions and leave it optional for registrar to offer additional 
protections?)
 3.  Further consideration of which updates constitute a change of ownership 
taking into account comments #5, #6 and #12
 4.  Further consideration of how to address fixing mistakes (i.e. Spelling 
error) as part of the change of registrant policy
 5.  Should policy apply equally to registrar / resellers (I.e. Change of 
registrant within a registrar / reseller or in combination with a change of 
registrar)?
 6.  Should change of registrant policy be separate from IRTP or combined with 
the IRTP?
 7.  Further consideration of whether there should be different provisions for 
when it concerns an organization or company instead of an individual that 
requests the change
 8.  Revisit the use of 'primary contact method' on page 23 of the Initial 
Report
 9.  Further consideration of the use of the AuthInfo code as the Change of 
Registrant Credential to validate the authorization of the Registrant to effect 
the change

Recommendation #2

      10. WG to review Transfer process and how AthInfo codes and FOA influence 
the transfer process as well as the process differences between change of 
registrant and change of registrar

If there are any other issues / topics, please feel free to add. You are 
encouraged to start discussion these open items on the mailing list. Please 
indicate clearly in the subject line which open item your comments concern. If 
easier, I'm also happy to create separate email threads and/or wiki pages to 
facilitate the discussion.

With best regards,

Marika

Attachment: Public comment review tool - Initial Report - Updated 29 August 2012.doc
Description: Public comment review tool - Initial Report - Updated 29 August 2012.doc



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy