Fwd: [gnso-irtpd] A series of questions (for Registries, DR providers and Registrars) arising from todays TDRP discussion
hi all, that's what happens when you try to do working-group work while running a tractor. i missed Kevin's note. so you "question answering type people" please add Kevin's questions to your list. thanks, mikey Begin forwarded message: > From: "Kevin Erdman" <krerdman@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] A series of questions (for Registries, DR providers > and Registrars) arising from todays TDRP discussion > Date: April 29, 2013 1:54:22 PM CDT > To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Mikey, thanks for organizing these questions, good first cut, a couple of > thoughts on expansion in your text below... > ____________________________ > Kevin R Erdman > Reichel IP LLP > 212 West 10th Street, Suite D-280 > Indianapolis, IN 46202 > voice 317.677.0689 > fax 317.454.1349 > skype kevimundo > web www.reichelip.com > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > From: Mike O'Connor > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 12:38 PM > To: gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: [gnso-irtpd] A series of questions (for Registries, DR providers and > Registrars) arising from todays TDRP discussion > > > hi all, > > i took an action to collect and organize our thoughts about a few useful > questions to ask Barbara to go research. as i pulled the results from the > chat i realized that we are actually asking questions of DR providers and > Registrars as well. so here's a preliminary list. you have 4 hours to > respond if you want your suggestions included in my next draft. sorry about > the harsh timing, but i'm going to be off the net for a while after that and > i want to get the final version out yet today. > > mikey > > > Questions for Barbara (and any other Registry type people) to analyze > > What was the reason that the TDRP was requested? > > How many of the TDRP cases (first or second level) are due to an improper > transfer and how many were because a transfer request was "nacked"? > Are there other reasons why TDRPs are requested? If so, what are they? > Is there a way to get a count of the number of TDRPs requested directly by > Registrants (and presumably denied)? > Is it possible to breakdown the statistics by which individual Registrars > filed and defended TDRPs? > > If the decision was in the win/loss column > > What's the proportion of wins vs losses? > How many of these Registry decisions were eventually appealed to the 2nd > level DRP? > Is there any information as to the final disposition of these disputes -- eg > UDRP, TDRP, arbitration, court case? > > If the decision was "no decision" > > What is the breakdown of reasons why that conclusion was reached? > How many of the TDRP’s filed were resolved by informal processes requiring no > decision? Were any such resolutions guided by Registry? > How many of these Registry decisions were eventually appealed to the 2nd > level DRP? > Is there any information as to the final disposition of these disputes -- eg > UDRP, TDRP, court case? > > Questions for 2nd-level DR providers > > Of those cases that they have received, have they received documentation from > both parties to the dispute? > > How many requests come directly from registrants (and are presumably denied)? > > Questions for Registrars > > for the Registrar mediated xfrs (this would not be for Barbara!)...are they > more likely to be an improper transfer or an improper denial of transfer? > > > > PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: > OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) > PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) Attachment:
smime.p7s |