Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Comments- Surveys

["\"Michele Neylon :: Blacknight\"" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Juan Manuel

I'm not sure how this question is related to our charter, so if you can explain 
the connection it would be helpful.

Regards

Michele


On 30 May 2012, at 23:34, Juan Manuel Rojas wrote:

> I am wondering if not be possible to add some question to now in which 
> domains exists more dispute (survey from providers) or maybe something about 
> approved dispute-resolution service provider through was initiated the UDRP 
> proceeding. 
> Excuse me if I am off-topic, just I was asking me about it and maybe would be 
> useful. 
> Best Regards,
>  
> JUAN MANUEL ROJAS
> Comunicador Social  
> Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia
> 
> Twitter: @JmanuRojas
> 
> Unete a LACRALO: 
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                                                 
> 
> De: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> Para: "Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx> 
> Enviado: Viernes, 25 de mayo, 2012 5:05 A.M.
> Asunto: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] For your review - Surveys
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> Please find attached and posted on the wiki (see 
> https://community.icann.org/display/udrpproceedings/Next+Meeting) an updated 
> version of the surveys for registrars and UDRP Providers. 
> 
> Having looked again at the registrar survey following the WG's discussion 
> yesterday, I've made an attempt to further simplify the survey by making the 
> starting question 'when' do you lock a domain name subject to UDRP 
> Proceedings which reduces the amount of questions that need to be asked 
> thereafter. This does assume that typically only one kind of lock is applied 
> at one point in time by a registrar during UDRP Proceedings. If this is an 
> incorrect assumption, we might need to make further changes. I did add one 
> question that allows a registrar to specify if they typically change the type 
> of lock applied and what the different characteristics are of this other 
> lock. Also, with regard to the 'wait period', I looked back to the email 
> explanation that John Berryhill sent according to which a 10 day wait period 
> applies in case the complainant wins and a 15 day wait period applies in case 
> the registrant wins. I've updated this accordingly in the survey (if this is 
> incorrect, please let me know). 
> 
> For the survey for UDRP providers, the changes made take into account the WG 
> discussion yesterday as well as the edits provided by WIPO. I did note that 
> in its comments WIPO questioned the relevance / usefulness of some of the 
> questions, so maybe that is something the WG can discuss in further detail at 
> the next meeting.
> 
> Please feel free to share any comments / edits and/or suggestions you may 
> have with the mailing list in advance of next week's meeting.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Marika
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://mneylon.tel/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845