RE: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] RE: For your review - Updated straw man proposal & public comment review tool

["Schneller, Matt" <Matt.Schneller@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hey Volker,

If not provided an active account number, many registrars open a new account 
for the winning party, e-mail the account number or other identifying info to 
the complainant's representative, and move the domain into that new account.  
Would that address the concern?  It gets the domain out of the registrar's 
hands...

Matt

From: owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Dorrain, Kristine
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 10:54 AM
To: Volker Greimann
Cc: 'Marika Konings'; Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] RE: For your review - Updated straw man proposal 
& public comment review tool

Yes...It may be within scope to recommend best practices for this as it is 
fully related to the unlock.   These best practices could/should be directed to 
both registrars AND complainants.

Kristine

From: Volker Greimann [mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 9:15 AM
To: Dorrain, Kristine
Cc: 'Marika Konings'; 
Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] RE: For your review - Updated straw man proposal 
& public comment review tool


Point 2 is for when the Complainant prevails.  The Registrar implements the 
transfer when the time period has run out.
Or at least tries to do so. If the complainant does not provide the necessary 
data to the registrar, the domain ownership or registration can not be 
transferred however much we wish to do so, i.e. the registrar may be unable to 
implement the decision.

Some complainants just tell us to transfer the domain name to registrar X and 
then never respond to our queries.

In other words, to demand that the registrar "implement the decision" may be 
demanding an impossible task in certain - albeit rare - cases.

Best,

Volker