<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt] Open Council Meeting Drafting Team
- To: "Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt] Open Council Meeting Drafting Team
- From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 00:30:32 -0700
If you are going into the direction of a Public Forum, you might also want to
consider soliciting topics from SG/Constituencies/ICANN Community prior to the
meeting, so that the agenda can be build up around the topics suggested. If the
topics suggested relate to ongoing projects, the agenda item could be kicked
off by a short update from the project leader or staff so that everyone is
aware what the issue is about, followed by open discussion, which could also
include discussion of motions if any are being considered in relation to the
issue.
Best regards,
Marika
From: "Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>"
<Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 15:26:02 -0700
Cc:
"'gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:'gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>'"
<gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: [gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt] Open Council Meeting Drafting Team
Thanks, Adrian, John and everyone, for getting us off to such a good start with
plenty of suggestions!
I like Adrian's idea of calling it the GNSO Public Forum, rather than the Open
Council Meeting. If we also incorporate some of the other excellent
suggestions, we may yet be able to increase audience participation and
engagement at the session. Hopefully this will not only provide the GNSO
community with an opportunity to give direct feedback and suggestions, it will
also allow the Council to interact directly with both active, regular GNSO
participants as well as newer entrants and other members of the ICANN community
outside the GNSO.
To that end, may I bring up a previous suggestion (I forget by who, sorry) that
we do a general Open Mic at the beginning of the meeting? This can supplement
the regular, shorter Open Mic minutes that Adrian has suggested interspersing
with the topical discussions throughout the meeting (on the assumption that
these other open mics will be geared more toward the specific topic under
discussion).
I also support Adrian's ideas that (1) we discuss future motions at the Public
Forum, and solicit feedback from the community; and (2) each SG/C (as
appropriate) give a short update (especially since the Public Forum will take
place after Constituency Day).
Additionally, I'd like to suggest that we invite, and actively seek the
participation of, other ICANN groups and participants. In particular, I think
it would be useful to extend a welcome to ICANN Fellows and other newbies (and
in this respect, the Briefing Papers we had discussed a while ago ca be very
helpful).
Cheers
Mary
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>>
From: Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>>
To: Adrian Kinderis
<adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>,
"john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
<john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
CC:
"'gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:'gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>'"
<gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>,
Glen de Saint Géry<Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: 7/7/2011 3:14 PM
Subject: RE: [gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt] Open Council Meeting Drafting Team
Hi Adrian,
Thanks so much for the amplification. I find it very helpful, and I’m excited
by your ideas to engage the audience more! Best, Liz
From: Adrian Kinderis [mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 11:53 AM
To: Liz Gasster; john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:
'gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:'gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>';
Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: RE: [gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt] Open Council Meeting Drafting Team
Thanks Liz.
I suppose I see the public meetings more as an opportunity to engage our
audience. We cannot do this if we are constrained by the usual practices of
motions etc.
We have plenty of opportunity for these in our usual meetings.
Let’s not call it a Public Meeting at all and call it the GNSO update and
public forum.
I think the current public meeting has an identity crisis.
Why do let people interact with the Council. We don’t let them at any other
time during our usual meetings. Instead we do this “tacked on” version where we
ask for public comment randomly. The comment very rarely helps with discussion
and doesn’t drive any healthy debate.
The other point is that if you have motions you really constrain the discussion
to that topic. I’d prefer to provide a broad cross section of discussion around
the entire Council’s work.
With respect to transcription, once again I would ask why is it in place? Do we
transcribe all our other meetings? Why is this one so special? I was thinking
that if we move to a “workshop” style meeting that the transcription simply
woudln;t be necessary.
Once again, these are just my thoughts as I write (I am horribly jetlagged and
not sure I am making any sense whatsoever!).
Adrian Kinderis
Chief Executive Officer
AusRegistry International Pty Ltd
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004
Ph: +61 3 9866 3710
Fax: +61 3 9866 1970
Email: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web: www.ausregistry.com<http://www.ausregistryinternational.com/>
- Follow AusRegistry International on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/ausregistryint<http://www.twitter.com/ausregistryint>
The information contained in this communication is intended for the named
recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged
and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must
not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system
and notify us immediately.
From: Liz Gasster [mailto:liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, 7 July 2011 12:20 PM
To: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Adrian Kinderis
Cc:
'gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:'gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>';
Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: RE: [gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt] Open Council Meeting Drafting Team
Hi all,
Glen is investigating why Adrian’s post did not go through (thanks John for
helping to identify this problem).
Adrian – I would find it helpful for you to expand a bit on why you suggest
that there not be a formal Council meeting, or motions, and that these meetings
not be transcribed. I do understand your point about the need to facilitate
greater community discussion during the public meetings. Are you saying that
you think not having a formal council meeting (without motions or transcript)
would help in that regard? Just seeking to understand…
Thanks so much! Liz
Ps. I’m also curious about “interpretive dance” in this context but I expect
we’ll hear more on that! thanks again…
From:
owner-gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 7:54 AM
To: Adrian Kinderis
Cc:
'gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:'gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>';
Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: RE: [gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt] Open Council Meeting Drafting Team
Yup.
Berard
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt] Open Council Meeting Drafting
Team
From: Adrian Kinderis
<adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thu, July 07, 2011 7:29 am
To: "'john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>'"
<john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>,
'Glen_de_Saint_Géry' <Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc:
"'gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>'"
<gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
Did everyone get this?
Adrian Kinderis
Chief Executive Officer
AusRegistry International Pty Ltd
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004
Ph: +61 3 9866 3710
Fax: +61 3 9866 1970
Email: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web: www.ausregistry.com<http://www.ausregistryinternational.com/>
- Follow AusRegistry International on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/ausregistryint<http://www.twitter.com/ausregistryint>
The information contained in this communication is intended for the named
recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged
and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must
not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system
and notify us immediately.
From: Adrian Kinderis
Sent: Wednesday, 6 July 2011 11:41 PM
To: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Glen_de_Saint_Géry
Cc: gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt] Open Council Meeting Drafting Team
Here is a few quick bulletpointed points;
- The meeting should not be a formal Council meeting
o No motions
o It should not be transcribed
- The meeting could be more an update of the work that has been/ is
currently being completed since the last “public meeting”
- Comments from the floor should be solicited continually through the
meeting
- WG’s should be encouraged to present their current issues/ progress
o They could solicit Council/ public input to any obstacles etc
- Future motions could be discussed
o This is where the good debate happens
- A summary of the weekend sessions could be provided
- Perhaps each stakeholder group could perform a short summary of who
they are and what their current concerns are
Does that help start with the thoughts.
Not particularly sexy... but that will come in the way we go about performing
the above (interpretive dance?)
Thanks.
Adrian Kinderis
Chief Executive Officer
AusRegistry International Pty Ltd
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004
Ph: +61 3 9866 3710
Fax: +61 3 9866 1970
Email: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web: www.ausregistry.com<http://www.ausregistryinternational.com/>
- Follow AusRegistry International on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/ausregistryint<http://www.twitter.com/ausregistryint>
The information contained in this communication is intended for the named
recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged
and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must
not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have
received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system
and notify us immediately.
From:
owner-gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, 5 July 2011 8:41 PM
To: Glen_de_Saint_Géry
Cc: gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt] Open Council Meeting Drafting Team
Hey!
Perhaps I can prime the pump by re-posting my initial thoughts when this effort
was suggested.
By "design," I was thinking of everything from the way we are arranged, in
relation to each other and the public participants to shifting the organization
of our work to get people to the mic earlier to using the speed of a consensus
agenda (as does the Board) to help prioritize in a more responsive way.
Feel free to pile on!
Berard
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt] Open Council Meeting Drafting Team
From: Glen_de_Saint_Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thu, June 23, 2011 6:17 pm
To: "gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-opencouncilmtg-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
Dear All,
As agreed at the GNSO Council wrap-up meeting a small group has been formed to
revise the format of the open Council meetings.
The Open Council Meeting Drafting Team mailing list is up and running.
As requested, the following people have been added to the list:
Stéphane Van Gelder
Adrian Kinderis
Zahid Jamil"
William Drake
Mary Wong
Jeff Neuman
John Berard
Please let me know whether you would like to be added to the drafting team.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|