RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

["Michael Young" <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Olga I agree with you, it should be two sub-tasks not one or the other.  I
suspect we can apply a very similar recommendation for both. 

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael Young

 

Vice-President,

Product Development

Afilias

O: +14166734109

C: +16472891220

 

From: Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: April-15-09 11:20 AM
To: jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

 

Hi,
if I am not mistaken, the two alternatives are valid and different, that is
to say:

- admission for a new const. to a stakeholder group 

and

- admission for new members for a constituency

To me they are focused in different issues and one should not substute the
other.
What do others think?
Regards
Olga



2009/4/15 Julie Hedlund <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Dear Work Team members,

 

S.S., the lead for Subtask 1, has recommended a change to make the wording
more clear for the first item under "Subtask 1: Develop recommendations for
a set of participation rules and operating procedures, which all
constituencies should abide by" in the Work Plan at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?osc_constituency_operations_work_te
am_task_1_work_plan.

 

Specifically, S.S. recommends changing:

 

"1.  Develop guidelines for defining admission decision procedures for a new
constituency for each stakeholder group." 

  

to: 

  

"1.  Develop guidelines for defining admission decision procedures for a new
member for each constituency."

 

I have reflected his recommendation in the plan.  Please let me know if you
have suggestions or comments.

 

Thank you.

 

Best regards,

 

Julie

 

Julie Hedlund

Policy Consultant