<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
- To: "Michael Young" <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Papac, Krista" <Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:51:44 -0400
Please note that our tasks with regard to constituency operations
relates to both existing and new constituencies. So to the extent that
the new wording eliminates existing constituencies, I don't think it
works. But maybe I am misunderstanding something. I strongly believe
that we seriously need to discuss this in our meeting and that that will
be much more effective.
Chuck
________________________________
From: Michael Young [mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 8:33 AM
To: 'Victoria McEvedy'; 'Papac, Krista'; Gomes, Chuck;
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; 'OSC-CSG Work Team'
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1,
Subtask 1
I think Victoria's point is quite valid and therefore support
the language with her edit.
Best Regards,
Michael Young
Vice-President,
Product Development
Afilias
O: +14166734109
C: +16472891220
From: Victoria McEvedy [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: April-22-09 2:55 AM
To: Papac, Krista; Gomes, Chuck; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG
Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1,
Subtask 1
As to the language issue, I do think we should discuss on our
call the carve out issue first -ie are there any aspects of the BGC's
report and recommendations on constituency structure: inclusiveness,
effectiveness and efficiency (see pages 39-46) that anyone considers are
not in our remit? If so why?
I am happy with the changes below -with the deletion of the
words NEW in each case -as our recommendations will apply to existing
constituencies just as to new ones.
I would like to suggest a way to combine these recommendations,
whereby we adopt the recommendation made by S.S., but keep the existing
item 1, as suggested by Olga and Michael, and also change the text as
suggested by Victoria. Here is the suggested text:
"1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation in a
new constituency for each stakeholder group." and
"2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation for
new members in a constituency. "
Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL
T: +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F: +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M: +44 (0) 7990 625 169
www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for
the exclusive use of the addressee(s). This email and its attachments
may also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error,
please let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and
no retainer is created by this email communication.
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Papac, Krista
Sent: 22 April 2009 02:27
To: Gomes, Chuck; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1,
Subtask 1
Sorry all. I am just catching up. I, too, am fine with 1 and 2
below.
Julie, thank you for the well articulated outline of the various
suggestions.
Krista Papac
Sales Executive
Iron Mountain Digital
5530 Bandini Blvd
Bell, CA 90201 US
Home Office: +001.714.846.8780
Mobile: +001.646.379.4689
Fax: +001.323.443.3573
krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Visit the new www.ironmountain.com
<http://www.ironmountain.com/>
Tour Iron Mountain
<http://www.ironmountain.com/US/services/tours/corporate.asp>
(c) 2008 Iron Mountain Incorporated. All rights reserved. Iron
Mountain and the design of the mountain are registered trademarks of
Iron Mountain Incorporated.
Iron Mountain Privacy Policy:
http://www.ironmountain.com/legal/privacy.asp Iron Mountain, 745
Atlantic Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111 www.ironmountain.com
<http://www.ironmountain.com/>
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 4:04 PM
To: jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1,
Subtask 1
I am fine with the latest suggested wording for 1 and 2 below.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 2:56 PM
To: OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan
Task 1, Subtask 1
Dear Work Team Members,
We have had a very helpful discussion on the email list
that has produced several recommendations to amend the language in Task
1, Subtask 1, of our work plan. Here are the recommendations:
1. S.S. recommends changing:
"1. Develop guidelines for defining admission decision
procedures for a new constituency for each stakeholder group." to:
"1. Develop guidelines for defining admission decision
procedures for a new member for each constituency."
2. Victoria noted that the language she suggested and
that we all agreed to was:
"Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation..." to replace "template for admission decision
procedures..."
3. Olga and Michael suggested that there could be two
items -- a revised item 1 and a new item 2 as follows:
"1. Develop guidelines for defining admission decision
procedures for a new constituency to a stakeholder group." and
"2. Develop guidelines for defining admission decision
procedures for a new member for each constituency."
I would like to suggest a way to combine these
recommendations, whereby we adopt the recommendation made by S.S., but
keep the existing item 1, as suggested by Olga and Michael, and also
change the text as suggested by Victoria. Here is the suggested text:
"1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation in a new constituency for each stakeholder group." and
"2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for
participation for new members in a constituency. "
I welcome your comments and suggestions. Thank you.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund
Policy Consultant
________________________________
The information contained in this email message and its
attachments is intended only for the private and confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise.
Transmission of email over the Internet is not a secure communications
medium. If you are requesting or have requested the transmittal of
personal data, as defined in applicable privacy laws by means of email
or in an attachment to email you must select a more secure alternate
means of transmittal that supports your obligations to protect such
personal data. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient and/or you have received this email in error, you must take no
action based on the information in this email and you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, misuse, copying, or disclosure of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete
the original message.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|