ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

  • To: "'Gomes, Chuck'" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Victoria McEvedy'" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Papac, Krista'" <Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'OSC-CSG Work Team'" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1
  • From: "Michael Young" <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:02:21 -0400

Victoria I understood your edits were to remove the "new" and just make the
statements neutral as to either new or existing constituencies?  Chuck do
you mean to more specific? Rather than neutral maybe it should just read as
follows:

 

"1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation in a new or
existing constituency for each stakeholder group." and 

"2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation for new or
existing members in a constituency. " 

 

 

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael Young

 

Vice-President,

Product Development

Afilias

O: +14166734109

C: +16472891220

 

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: April-22-09 9:52 AM
To: Michael Young; Victoria McEvedy; Papac, Krista; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx;
OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

 

Please note that our tasks with regard to constituency operations relates to
both existing and new constituencies.  So to the extent that the new wording
eliminates existing constituencies, I don't think it works.  But maybe I am
misunderstanding something.  I strongly believe that we seriously need to
discuss this in our meeting and that that will be much more effective.

 

Chuck

 


  _____  


From: Michael Young [mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 8:33 AM
To: 'Victoria McEvedy'; 'Papac, Krista'; Gomes, Chuck;
jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; 'OSC-CSG Work Team'
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

I think Victoria's point is quite valid and therefore support the language
with her edit.

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael Young

 

Vice-President,

Product Development

Afilias

O: +14166734109

C: +16472891220

 

From: Victoria McEvedy [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: April-22-09 2:55 AM
To: Papac, Krista; Gomes, Chuck; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

 

As to the language issue, I do think we should discuss on our call the carve
out issue first -ie are there any aspects of the BGC's report and
recommendations on constituency structure: inclusiveness, effectiveness and
efficiency (see pages 39-46) that anyone considers are not in our remit? If
so why? 

 

I am happy with the changes below -with the deletion of the words NEW in
each case -as our recommendations will apply to existing constituencies just
as to new ones. 

 

I would like to suggest a way to combine these recommendations, whereby we
adopt the recommendation made by S.S., but keep the existing item 1, as
suggested by Olga and Michael, and also change the text as suggested by
Victoria.  Here is the suggested text: 

 

"1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation in a new
constituency for each stakeholder group." and 

"2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation for new members
in a constituency. " 

 

 

 

 

Victoria McEvedy

Principal 

McEvedys

Solicitors and Attorneys 

cid:669FC637-760A-4D2F-B56E-2C180C1870CC

 

96 Westbourne Park Road 

London 

W2 5PL

 

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

 

www.mcevedy.eu  

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also
be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us
know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without
reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer
is created by this email communication. 

 

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Papac, Krista
Sent: 22 April 2009 02:27
To: Gomes, Chuck; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

 

Sorry all.  I am just catching up.  I, too, am fine with 1 and 2 below.

 

Julie, thank you for the well articulated outline of the various
suggestions.

 

Krista Papac 
Sales Executive 
Iron Mountain Digital 
5530 Bandini Blvd 
Bell, CA  90201  US 
Home Office: +001.714.846.8780 
Mobile: +001.646.379.4689 
Fax: +001.323.443.3573 
 <mailto:krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Visit the new  <http://www.ironmountain.com/> www.ironmountain.com 
 <http://www.ironmountain.com/US/services/tours/corporate.asp> Tour Iron
Mountain 

C 2008 Iron Mountain Incorporated. All rights reserved. Iron Mountain and
the design of the mountain are registered trademarks of Iron Mountain
Incorporated. 

Iron Mountain Privacy Policy: http://www.ironmountain.com/legal/privacy.asp
Iron Mountain, 745 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111
<http://www.ironmountain.com/> www.ironmountain.com


  _____  


From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 4:04 PM
To: jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

 

I am fine with the latest suggested wording for 1 and 2 below.

 

Chuck

 


  _____  


From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 2:56 PM
To: OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC-CSG Work Team Work Plan Task 1, Subtask 1

Dear Work Team Members,

 

We have had a very helpful discussion on the email list that has produced
several recommendations to amend the language in Task 1, Subtask 1, of our
work plan.  Here are the recommendations:

 

1.  S.S. recommends changing: 

 

"1.  Develop guidelines for defining admission decision procedures for a new
constituency for each stakeholder group."  to: 

"1.  Develop guidelines for defining admission decision procedures for a new
member for each constituency."

 

2.  Victoria noted that the language she suggested and that we all agreed
to was: 

 

"Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation..." to replace
"template for admission decision procedures..." 

 

3.  Olga and Michael suggested that there could be two items -- a revised
item 1 and a new item 2 as follows: 

 

"1.  Develop guidelines for defining admission decision procedures for a new
constituency to a stakeholder group." and 

"2. Develop guidelines for defining admission decision procedures for a new
member for each constituency."  

 

I would like to suggest a way to combine these recommendations, whereby we
adopt the recommendation made by S.S., but keep the existing item 1, as
suggested by Olga and Michael, and also change the text as suggested by
Victoria.  Here is the suggested text: 

 

"1. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation in a new
constituency for each stakeholder group." and 

"2. Develop guidance, rules or principles for participation for new members
in a constituency. " 

 

I welcome your comments and suggestions.  Thank you.  

 

Best regards, 

 

Julie

Julie Hedlund

Policy Consultant

 


  _____  


The information contained in this email message and its attachments is
intended only for the private and confidential use of the recipient(s) named
above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise. Transmission of email
over the Internet is not a secure communications medium. If you are
requesting or have requested the transmittal of personal data, as defined in
applicable privacy laws by means of email or in an attachment to email you
must select a more secure alternate means of transmittal that supports your
obligations to protect such personal data. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient and/or you have received this email in error, you
must take no action based on the information in this email and you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, misuse, copying, or disclosure of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete the
original message. 

JPEG image



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy