ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM 1: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April Meeting

  • To: "Claudio Di Gangi" <CDiGangi@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM 1: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April Meeting
  • From: "Julie Hedlund" <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 12:19:26 -0400

Claudio,

Thank you very much for your helpful clarfications!  I will update the
document accordingly.

Best regards,

Julie
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Claudio Di Gangi [mailto:CDiGangi@xxxxxxxx]
  Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 12:12 PM
  To: Victoria McEvedy; Olga Cavalli; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx
  Cc: OSC-CSG Work Team
  Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM 1: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April
Meeting


  Julie,



  Thank you, I thought you did good work on this in a very short time
period!



  The document indicates that the IPC does not have term limits for
constituency officers. The IPC charter section regarding constituency
officers is Section IV, and term limits are described in this section (see
Section B. Terms of Office.)



  The document also states that: The IPC web site or charter does not appear
to describe processes to encourage global participation. This is a specific
responsibility assigned to the elected officers of the constituency, who are
charged with ?reaching out to any other interested IP groups around the
world and encourage them to participate in the IPC.? see Section IV. IPC
Officers, Subsection C (2) F. Powers.



  Victoria,



  In the IPC, both Category 3 (international intellectual property
organizations) and Category 2 (local, state, or purely national intellectual
property organizations) members are entitled to vote. See IPC Charter
Section III. IPC Council, Subsection D. Also see Sections VI. Elections.
Subsection 6.



  Claudio




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Victoria McEvedy
  Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 4:07 AM
  To: Olga Cavalli; jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx
  Cc: OSC-CSG Work Team
  Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM 1: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April
Meeting



  Julie thank you. I think we ought to have given you some more guidance as
I?m afraid the exercise is too limited at present to be of real use. It may
be that the team needs to identify other criteria for inclusion.



  I note that the IPC has classes of membership and not all can vote. In
fact ?only international organizations can have a vote.



  I filed a Minority Report detailing issues with ?participation? in the
IPC. You will see why membership eligibility and admission templates do not
encompass these sorts of issues ?nor does our chart in so far as it is
similarly limited.



  Best,



  Victoria McEvedy

  Principal

  McEvedys

  Solicitors and Attorneys





  96 Westbourne Park Road

  London

  W2 5PL



  T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

  F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

  M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169



  www.mcevedy.eu

  Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

  This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also
be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us
know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without
reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

  This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer
is created by this email communication.



  From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
  Sent: 01 May 2009 00:24
  To: jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx
  Cc: OSC-CSG Work Team
  Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM 1: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April
Meeting



  Dear Julie,
  Thanks a lot for the document, I think it is very good in order to
starting a revision of the existing constituencie´s available information.
  As we wait for the analysis of the proposed stakeholder group charters, I
would encourage each constituecy representative in our working team to
review the document and make suggestions of changes and/or additions.
  Regards to all,
  Olga

  2009/4/30 Julie Hedlund <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>

  Dear Work Team Members,



  Attached for your review and consideration is a draft preliminary analysis
of existing constituencies against the criteria in subtasks 1, 2, and 3 in
response to Action Item 1 from the 24 April 2009 meeting.  This document
also is linked to the wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.  In
this preliminary analysis there appeared to be many instances where
information did not seem to be listed in constituency charters or web sites.
These instances are indicated in the attached document with an "X" or "?
NEED INPUT."  In these cases perhaps those Work Team members who represent
constituencies may be able to provide suggestions for locating the
information if it is available.



  Soon to follow is an analysis of the proposed stakeholder group charters.
This task likely will require less research as there are no sources other
than the charters (such as web sites) to analyze.



  Thank you very much for your assistance.  Your comments and suggestions
for improving this document are greatly appreciated.



  Best regards,



  Julie



  Julie Hedlund

  Policy Consultant




Attachment: image001.jpg
Description: JPEG image



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy