<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM 1: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April Meeting
- To: <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM 1: OSC-CSG Work Team 24 April Meeting
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:16:52 -0400
Thanks for sending this Julie. It appears to me that the RyC
information is correct.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:53 PM
To: OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM 1: OSC-CSG Work Team 24
April Meeting
Dear Work Team Members,
Attached for your review and consideration is a draft
preliminary analysis of existing constituencies against the criteria in
subtasks 1, 2, and 3 in response to Action Item 1 from the 24 April 2009
meeting. This document also is linked to the wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.
In this preliminary analysis there appeared to be many instances where
information did not seem to be listed in constituency charters or web
sites. These instances are indicated in the attached document with an
"X" or "? NEED INPUT." In these cases perhaps those Work Team members
who represent constituencies may be able to provide suggestions for
locating the information if it is available.
Soon to follow is an analysis of the proposed stakeholder group
charters. This task likely will require less research as there are no
sources other than the charters (such as web sites) to analyze.
Thank you very much for your assistance. Your comments and
suggestions for improving this document are greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund
Policy Consultant
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|