RE: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: Additional Constituency Staff Analysis Information

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Victoria.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Victoria McEvedy
        Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 6:32 PM
        To: Victoria McEvedy; Robert Hoggarth; Hector Ariel Manoff;
Claudio Di Gangi
        Cc: Ken Bour; Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: Additional Constituency Staff
Analysis Information
        
        

        The attachment to the previous email -I don't think this has
forwarded. 

         

         

        Victoria McEvedy

        Principal 

        McEvedys

        Solicitors and Attorneys 

         

         

        96 Westbourne Park Road 

        London 

        W2 5PL

         

        T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

        F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

        M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

         

        www.mcevedy.eu  

        Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

        This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for
the exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments
may also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error,
please let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

        This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and
no retainer is created by this email communication. 

         

        From: Victoria McEvedy 
        Sent: 22 May 2009 23:31
        To: 'Robert Hoggarth'; Hector Ariel Manoff; Claudio Di Gangi
        Cc: Ken Bour; Julie Hedlund; 'gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx'
        Subject: RE: Additional Constituency Staff Analysis Information

         

         

        Thank you Robert. 

         

        I draw the team's attention to the new template Constituency
Charter -already prepared by staff. 

         

        See "In its next amendment process, Staff suggests that the IPC
consider using the New Constituency Petition and Charter Template
(hereinafter "Template") as a guide for both organization and content.
It was developed by the Staff to be consistent with the improvements
recommendations endorsed by the ICANN Board and is available at:  
http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/newco-process-en.htm.''  

         

        Olga/Chuck/ -were you aware of this document? 

         

        Regards, 

         

        Victoria McEvedy

        Principal 

        McEvedys

        Solicitors and Attorneys 

        

         

        96 Westbourne Park Road 

        London 

        W2 5PL

         

        T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

        F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

        M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

         

        www.mcevedy.eu  

        Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

        This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for
the exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments
may also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error,
please let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

        This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and
no retainer is created by this email communication. 

         

        From: Robert Hoggarth [mailto:robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: 22 May 2009 20:21
        To: Victoria McEvedy; Hector Ariel Manoff; Claudio Di Gangi
        Cc: Ken Bour; Julie Hedlund
        Subject: Additional Constituency Staff Analysis Information

         

        Dear Victoria, Hector and Claudio;
        
        My memo to the CSG Work Team earlier today reminded a colleague
that one of the preliminary informal discussions between staff and
community included the IPC (It wasn't a bad experience so I don't know
why I blanked on it) and that an analysis of the IPC Charter was shared
with the IPC leadership. 
        
        In the interest of getting you all the information you can
handle, I have tracked down and am attaching a copy of that feedback to
this message. I think it is largely similar in substance to the document
that Julie prepared for the team, but in the interest of information
sharing (hopefully not overload) I am including that information for
you. 
        
        I will try to track down the other materials related to those
preliminary discussions with other constituencies as appropriate and
share them collectively with the entire CSG team next week.  As I said
in today's memo, I think Julie's analysis largely covered the field, but
it won't hurt to do further comparisons, or at least have that
information available for your analysis.
        
        Have a great weekend!
        
        Rob Hoggarth