<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc-csg] MEETING MINUTES: June 21 meeting
- To: <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] MEETING MINUTES: June 21 meeting
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:52:37 -0400
I was hoping you would say that. Thanks. I still had it on my
calendar.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 2:49 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; Olga Cavalli
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] MEETING MINUTES: June 21 meeting
Chuck,
The next call is scheduled for Friday, 10 July at at 13:00 UTC
(06:00 PDT). I'll send you via separate email the notice that Gisella
sent out. So, no meeting tomorrow on our U.S. holiday.
Have a great weekend!
Julie
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 2:41 PM
To: Claudio Di Gangi; Olga Cavalli
Cc: SS Kshatriy; rafik dammak; Victoria McEvedy;
gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] MEETING MINUTES: June 21
meeting
Don't we have a call this week? Tomorrow?
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Claudio Di Gangi
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 1:50 PM
To: 'Olga Cavalli'
Cc: SS Kshatriy; rafik dammak; Victoria McEvedy;
gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] MEETING MINUTES:
June 21 meeting
Yes, I will try to get back to SS at least a few
days prior to our call next week.
Claudio
________________________________
From: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 11:28 PM
To: Claudio Di Gangi
Cc: SS Kshatriy; rafik dammak; Victoria McEvedy;
gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] MEETING MINUTES:
June 21 meeting
Thanks Claudio for the clarification.
Any of your comments to the remarks done by SS
could be very useful.
Best regards
Olga
2009/6/25 Claudio Di Gangi <cdigangi@xxxxxxxx>
Sorry for not updating the group about that SS.
It was my oversight!
________________________________________
From: SS Kshatriy [sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 7:43 PM
To: Claudio Di Gangi; rafik dammak; Victoria
McEvedy
Cc: gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] MEETING MINUTES:
June 21 meeting
Dear Claudio Di Gangi,
Refrerence to the meeting minutes and your
remarks:
"Claudio DiGangi noted that, with respect to
Task 1, Subtask 1, he was unaware of any updates from the subtask
leader, S.S."
I will invite your attention to my mail of May
11 to subtask 1 participants that is copied below. You are requested to
respond to my mail.
--
I had posted updates on May 26. You would have
just received the latest updates too. I will request your remarks and
participation.
regards,
SS
--- On Mon, 5/11/09, SS Kshatriy
<sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: SS Kshatriy <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEMS:
OSC-Constituency Operations Work Team-Subtask1
To: "Claudio Di Gangi" <CDiGangi@xxxxxxxx>,
"rafik dammak" <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>, "Victoria McEvedy"
<victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, May 11, 2009, 1:21 AM
Dear Participants,
Subject-- Completing of Action Items for Subtask
1
I have gone through the analysis of
Constituenccies by Julie. As a premiliminary step, I have further
analysed Subtask 1.2 in detail for two action itmes. This analysis is
given below my signature.
1. Please give your ideas how to proceed with
the completion of action items?
2. Reference to Draft Work Plan, is there any
clash/lconflict between Subtask 1.2 and Subtask 2.1?
I will look forward to your input.
regards,
SS
---
Subtask 1.2 Develop guidelines, rules, or
principles for participation in constituencies.
Only two criteria are analyzed here:
a. Bringing out a Motion on Policy
Issues and
b. Elections.
1. Commercial and Business Constituency have in
their charter
http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/recertification-bc-constituency-ja
n09.pdf :
a. Procedure for developing written policy by
bringing out a motion on policy issue by appointed 'Rapporteurs'. There
is passing reference that any member can propose a position paper. But
there is no procedure for this.
It needs to be elaborated and clear rules laid
down.
b. There are clear rules for Election of
Officers for representation in GNSO but it lacks proper management.
Management of the Constituency is governed by:
section 4.2 'Officers and 4.3 Secretariat'. It is a surprising that
election is done for GNSO Council and such councilors become Officers of
the Constituency to run and manage the organization. It should have been
otherwise. Assume a typical situation when due to any reason,
Constituency has no representation in GNSO Council. It will then be left
with no management. Ideal situation should be that there is a well
managed Organization that has representation in GNSO Council and other
bodies.
Hence provision for regular management body,
independent of GNSO representation should exist.
2. Registries (gTLD) have 'Articles of
Operation' http://www.gtldregistries.org/about_us/articles , which has
clear and elaborate rules for:
a. Bringing out a motion for decision making on
an issue and
b. Election of officers.
3. Internet Service Provider & Connectivity
Provider Constituency (ISPCP)
http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/recertification-ispcp-04feb09.pdf
have called their submission a Charter.
a. Section 3.1 'Decision Making Processes in the
ISPCP' needs strengthening and elaborating.
It should have provisions for Constituency
Members to raise issues and carry out motions.
b. It has procedures for elections.
c. There is no proper Charter. Above referred
document is a submission for Constituency Renewal. There is no link for
any Charter Document in the ISPCP's Website and as such, it is not a
public document.
The Constituency should have proper Charter or
Byelaws.
4. Non-Commercial User's Constituency
http://ncuc.syr.edu/current_charter.htm
a. There is no provision for members to raise
issues. Changes in Charter alone can be brought about. This needs to be
incorporated in the charter.
Section IX Communication needs to be
strengthened for this purpose.
b. Charter has well laid out procedure for
elections.
5. Registrars Constituency
http://www.icannregistrars.org/RC_Bylaws and
http://www.icannregistrars.org/Registrar_Constituency_Rules_of_Procedure
The Constituency has good rules for:
a. Bringing out a motion for decision making on
an issue and
b. Election of officers.
6. Intellectual Property Constituency
http://www.ipconstituency.org/bylaws.htm
The Constituency has good rules for:
a. Bringing out a motion for decision making on
an issue. However, there is no provision at all for the members
belonging to Category 1A and 1B to participate in the affairs of the
Constituency or for them to be heard.
There should be some provision for such members
for participation.
b. Good rules for election of officers.
----
--
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|