<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps
- To: "Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Claudio Di Gangi" <cdigangi@xxxxxxxx>, "Michael Young" <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>, "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:39:27 -0400
With the approval of the contracted party SG charters, there are no longer any
recertifications of constituencies, but you could still look at the
communications that happened to get to that point if you think that is useful,
assuming that Staff can provide the info you are looking for.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Victoria McEvedy
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 12:19 PM
To: Claudio Di Gangi; Michael Young; Olga Cavalli;
owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Cc: Julie Hedlund; Gisella Gruber-White; Glen de Saint Géry; Robert
Hoggarth
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps
No Claudio, I don't have the contracted parties' documents either.
Regards,
Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL
T: +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F: +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M: +44 (0) 7990 625 169
www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s). This email and its attachments may also be
legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by
reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading,
copying or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no
retainer is created by this email communication.
From: Claudio Di Gangi [mailto:cdigangi@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: 01 September 2009 16:57
To: 'Michael Young'; Victoria McEvedy; 'Olga Cavalli';
owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; 'OSC-CSG Work Team'
Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Gisella Gruber-White'; 'Glen de Saint Géry';
'Robert Hoggarth'
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps
Victoria,
The draft document you wrote, states under "Staff Review":
"The Staff reviewed each Constituency Charter and Recertification
application and made comments and suggestions to each Constituency. We also
considered the Staff comments [and responses from Constituencies] [create
master schedule and refer]."
I do not recall ever seeing the staff comments on the Registry or
Registrar constituency recertification documents. The last email I have from
Rob on this (attached) has the staff comments on the non-contracting party
recertification documents.
Do you have a copy of the staff comments on contracting-party
recertification documents?
Rob, if you have not sent these over to our list yet, can you please do
so?
Thanks
Claudio
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Young
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 10:59 AM
To: victoria@xxxxxxxxxx; 'Olga Cavalli'; owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx;
'OSC-CSG Work Team'
Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Gisella Gruber-White'; 'Glen de Saint Géry';
'Robert Hoggarth'
Subject: [Junk released by Allow List] RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps
Victoria please find my comments. In general this represents a great
deal of effort and I'd like to recognize that.
Thank you for the contribution.
Best Regards,
Michael Young
Vice-President,
Product Development
Afilias
O: +14166734109
C: +16472891220
From: victoria@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: August-31-09 6:05 AM
To: Olga Cavalli; owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Cc: Julie Hedlund; Gisella Gruber-White; Glen de Saint Géry; Robert
Hoggarth
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps
Olga - I was proposing to write up and summarise comments on subtask
1.2 --rather than include them verbatim. Both your comments and those of other
subtask members and any others. I'd like to reserve the final decision on that
until the final comments come in tomorrow. I think we also need to consider our
timeframes again following Robert's point ---and work in time for us to try to
reach a consensus ---as its this group that must try to do so ---not our
steering committee. Victoria
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
________________________________
From: Olga Cavalli
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:29:11 -0300
To: OSC-CSG Work Team<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps
Hi,
some comments:
1. I have finished reviewing the document prepared by VIctoria, which
is very complete and includes several recommendations.
Claudio has already comment, also mysefl. The document with our
comments is attached to this email, please remember we have a due date for this
revision which is next Tuesday 1st September.
2. SS will send his documents in parts, Krista will send her documents
soon.
3. Julie will include Claudio´s recommendations in her document.
We will try to have all draft document of subtasks by Friday 4
september and organize our work during our conference call that day.
Please let me know if any of you need help.
Regards to all and have a good week.
Olga
2009/8/28 Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dear Work Team members,
First let me commend all of you for all the work done so far.
We have made a great progress and we still have some more work to do in
order to reach our gol in finishing a recommendations draft document by the end
of next week.
In this sense let me summarize what was discussed in our conference
call today:
1. WT should look and comment SS document.
SS will add background and additional information and will circulate
new version of the document.
2. A due date for sending comments to Victoria´s document is set for
next Tuesday, members of subworking team are welcome to comment and the rest of
the wt also can comment.
3. Krista and Tony will send to the list their draft recommendations
document, Victoria will join them in doing this task.
WT should review and comment the document once sent to the list.
4. Julie: is it possible to consider / include Claudio´s suggestions to
your draft document about subtask 4?
5. Formatting of the final draft recommendations document: my
suggestion is to use the same format that Julie and Chuck use in theirs:
references, introduction, background, recommendations and add a general
conclusion. I volunteer for preparing the general draft once we have the
different parts ready.
6. Timing: we should define the due date for sending our draft document
to the OSC.
Chuck, could you please help us defining this date? Considering that
the document must be approved by the OSC and by the GNSO council and next
conference call of GNSO are Sept 3 and Sept 24.
Remember that we have our next conference call next Friday 1300 GMT.
Have a nice weekend and thanks again for your active participation and
hard work.
Best
Olga
--
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar
--
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4386 (20090901) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4386 (20090901) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|